Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2124

Introduced
1/19/22  
Refer
1/21/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Refer
2/17/22  
Report Pass
3/4/22  
Engrossed
3/8/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/11/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  

Caption

Relating To Noise Control.

Impact

The proposed legislation seeks to enhance the quality of life for residents living near liquor establishments by limiting noise pollution and establishing enforceable sound level restrictions. By specifically defining noise violation penalties and the conditions under which liquor licenses can be revoked or suspended, SB2124 aims to empower local communities and governmental bodies to enforce regulations that contribute to peaceful and healthy living environments. The enforcement of these measures is intended to provide residents a recourse against disturbances that excessively intrude upon their daily lives.

Summary

SB2124 relates to noise control measures specific to establishments selling liquor in Hawaii. This bill amends sections of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to set maximum permissible sound levels measured in decibels during different times of the day and in various zoning areas. For example, it specifies that in residential areas, the sound level should not exceed fifty-five decibels during the day and forty-five at night. Establishments failing to comply with these regulations may face revocation or suspension of their liquor licenses, ensuring that noise complaints from residents are effectively addressed by the appropriate authorities.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding SB2124 appears to lean towards support among community members who have experienced noise disturbances. Advocates argue that this bill represents a vital step forward in community governance, enabling jurisdictions to maintain higher standards for public tranquility. However, some business owners and industry representatives express concerns about the potential implications of stringent noise controls, fearing that these measures may negatively affect their patronage and operational freedom, thus revealing a contentious divide between community welfare and business interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB2124 include the precise maximum sound levels established for different zoning classifications and the criteria for measuring compliance. Critics argue that the decibel thresholds could be too restrictive for businesses, thereby diminishing their competitive edge. Furthermore, the enforceability of the proposed measures raises questions, specifically regarding the allocation of enforcement duties to law enforcement and whether such actions will prioritize community concerns over business operations.

Companion Bills

HI HB1854

Same As Relating To Noise Control.

Similar Bills

CA AB2048

Community colleges: systemic campus reforms: sexual harassment: report.

CA AB989

Educational equity: sex equity in education: federal Title IX complaints.

CA AB2047

Public postsecondary education: discrimination prevention.

CA AB1975

Nuisance: odors.

CA AB1720

Clinics: prenatal screening.

CA SB957

Public Employment Relations Board: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: employee relations.

CA SB334

Pupil instruction: sexual harassment, sexual assault, and sexual abuse prevention: safety.

NV AB490

Revises provisions relating to the venue for certain proceedings. (BDR 24-870)