Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2125

Introduced
1/19/22  
Refer
1/21/22  
Report Pass
2/8/22  
Refer
2/8/22  
Report Pass
3/4/22  
Engrossed
3/4/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
4/8/22  
Report Pass
4/29/22  
Report Pass
4/29/22  
Enrolled
5/3/22  
Chaptered
6/17/22  

Caption

Relating To Liquor Licenses.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to have a significant impact on the enforcement of liquor laws across Hawaii. With the adjusted penalty structure, liquor commissions and adjudication boards will possess increased authority to impose heftier fines, which are perceived to serve as a stronger deterrent against potential violations. This legislative change could lead to a greater emphasis on compliance from business owners and an overall improvement in the responsible sale and consumption of alcohol. However, it may also impose additional financial burdens on establishments that find themselves in violation of these laws.

Summary

Senate Bill 2125 aims to amend the current regulations surrounding liquor licenses in Hawaii. Specifically, the bill seeks to increase the maximum allowable fine for violations of liquor control laws from $2,000 to $5,000. The rationale behind this adjustment is to enhance deterrence against violations such as selling liquor to minors or intoxicated individuals, as well as ensuring compliance from liquor establishments. By allowing for higher penalties, the bill is intended to promote greater adherence to the state’s liquor regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2125 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers who believe that increasing penalties is a necessary step in addressing liquor-related issues in the state. Proponents argue that the potential for larger fines will promote greater accountability and responsibility among license holders. On the other hand, there could be concerns expressed by those worried about the financial implications on small businesses that may struggle to absorb significantly higher fines, thus causing division among various stakeholder groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include discussions on whether the increased fines would disproportionately affect smaller businesses compared to larger establishments. Critics of intensified penalty structures often argue that while aiming for compliance is essential, it should not come at the cost of driving smaller liquor establishments out of business. Furthermore, there may be ongoing debates concerning the balance between enforcing compliance while also considering the economic realities faced by licensees.

Companion Bills

HI HB1855

Same As Relating To Liquor Licenses.

Similar Bills

NJ A1040

Requires MVC to accept death certificate as proof of name change.

NJ A3595

Requires MVC to accept death certificates as proof of name change.

HI SB979

Relating To Liquor Licenses.

HI SB1103

Relating To Liquor Licenses.

HI SB687

Relating To Intoxicating Liquor.

HI SB1103

Relating To Liquor Licenses.

HI HB1372

Relating To Liquor Licenses.

HI HB1458

Relating To Liquor Licenses.