Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2379

Introduced
1/21/22  
Refer
1/24/22  
Refer
1/31/22  
Report Pass
2/9/22  
Refer
2/9/22  
Report Pass
3/4/22  
Engrossed
3/8/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
4/8/22  
Report Pass
4/29/22  
Report Pass
4/29/22  
Enrolled
5/3/22  
Chaptered
6/17/22  

Caption

Relating To The Special Enforcement Section.

Impact

The implementation of SB 2379 significantly affects the enforcement of tax laws in Hawaii. By authorizing the Special Enforcement Section to investigate suspected violations, the bill aims to uphold tax revenue integrity across various sectors, particularly within cash-based businesses. The changes will require the section to issue citations and penalties for infractions and to facilitate public meetings to foster better taxpayer understanding and compliance. This could lead to increased state revenue from improved collection and enforcement activities.

Summary

Senate Bill 2379, known as the Special Enforcement Section Bill, focuses on enhancing the powers and functions of the Special Enforcement Section of the Department of Taxation in Hawaii. This bill allows the section to examine any sector of the state's economy in an effort to ensure compliance with taxation laws. It establishes a framework for civil investigations, enabling the section to initiate actions against non-compliant taxpayers. The bill also emphasizes education and enforcement as dual tactics to deter tax law violations.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB 2379 is generally supportive among proponents of strict tax enforcement, including government officials who believe that enhanced investigations will lower tax evasion rates. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential for overreach and the impacts on small businesses. Detractors worry that aggressive enforcement tactics could disproportionately affect those who may struggle with compliance due to economic constraints, suggesting a need for balance between enforcement and support for taxpayers.

Contention

Opposition to SB 2379 centers around worries that the expanded powers of the enforcement section might infringe on taxpayer rights and lead to overly aggressive investigations. Critics argue that the bill could facilitate unwarranted scrutiny of small businesses and individual taxpayers, potentially creating a hostile regulatory environment. There is a call from some quarters to ensure that any enforcement actions are coupled with adequate support mechanisms for compliance to prevent negative fallout on those who may not fully understand their obligations under the revised tax regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S1093

Codifies AG directive concerning criminal investigations of law enforcement use-of-force and in-custody deaths.

NJ A813

Codifies AG directive concerning criminal investigations of law enforcement use-of-force and in-custody deaths.

CA AB31

Whistleblowers: California State Auditor.

MS SB2036

DA criminal investigators; revise allocation and compensation of.

CA AB718

Peace officers: investigations of misconduct.

CA AB1179

Child custody: allegations of abuse: report.

CA SB1069

State prisons: Office of the Inspector General.

CA AB1911

Residential care facilities: complaints.