Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2518

Introduced
1/21/22  
Refer
1/24/22  
Report Pass
2/18/22  

Caption

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

Impact

The potential impact of SB2518 on state laws centers around consumer protection, particularly in creating a legal framework to challenge the pricing disparities that disproportionately affect women. By formally recognizing gender-based pricing as a deceptive trade practice, the legislation empowers consumers to take action against manufacturers and retailers that engage in such practices, thus enhancing regulatory oversight and compliance in the marketplace.

Summary

Senate Bill 2518, aimed at addressing gender-based pricing, establishes that charging different prices for substantially similar products based on the gender of consumers constitutes an unlawful deceptive trade practice in Hawaii. The bill responds to findings highlighting the so-called 'pink tax', where women often pay more for similar products marketed towards them compared to those marketed for men. The legislation amends Chapter 481A of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to explicitly categorize such pricing strategies as deceptive, thereby protecting consumers from discrimination in pricing practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely positive, especially among proponents who view it as a crucial step towards achieving gender equality in consumer rights. Advocates argue that eliminating gender-based pricing not only fosters fairness but also uplifts the economic status of women. However, there may be concerns within certain business sectors regarding the implementation of these regulations and the potential for increased scrutiny of pricing practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill’s definition of 'substantially similar goods' and its application. Critics may raise questions about the feasibility of enforcing such provisions and the implications for manufacturers and retailers who may unintentionally incur liabilities under this new standard. Moreover, there could be debates about balancing consumer protection with the autonomy of businesses in setting prices, as well as discussions regarding the government’s role in regulating market practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

HI SB373

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB2020

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI HB643

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB158

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI HB514

Relating To Price Transparency.

HI HB41

Relating To Price Transparency.

HI SB380

Relating To Unfair And Deceptive Practices.

HI SB2140

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB1324

Relating To Insurance.

HI SB2100

Relating To Discriminatory Practices.

Similar Bills

CA AB1287

Price discrimination: gender.

AZ SB1092

Product liability; civil action; limitation

LA SB152

Provides relative to certain unauthorized acts of motor vehicle manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, distributor branches, factory branches, and converters. (8/1/22)

HI SB373

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB373

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

AZ SB1453

Hemp-derived impairing cannabinoids; regulation

CA SB1249

Animal testing: cosmetics.

WV HB2551

Relating to consumer protection of new manufactured home warranties