Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2624

Introduced
1/21/22  
Refer
1/24/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Refer
2/17/22  
Report Pass
3/4/22  
Engrossed
3/8/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/18/22  
Refer
3/18/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
4/8/22  
Report Pass
4/29/22  
Report Pass
4/29/22  
Enrolled
5/3/22  
Chaptered
6/27/22  

Caption

Relating To Health.

Impact

The legislation proposes funding for a telehealth pilot project and a rural healthcare pilot project, both of which aim to enhance service delivery in targeted areas. A key feature of the rural healthcare project is the provision of an availability fee to incentivize healthcare providers to serve in regions where access to specialists is particularly limited. This fee, along with reimbursements for travel costs incurred by these providers, is expected to encourage specialists to prioritize care in rural settings, ultimately improving health outcomes for local residents who often face barriers related to distance and access to specialized medical care.

Summary

Senate Bill 2624 aims to enhance healthcare accessibility for Hawaii residents, particularly targeting those in rural and medically underserved areas. The bill establishes pilot projects centered around telehealth and rural healthcare initiatives, seeking to tackle provider shortages in primary and specialty care. By optimizing existing resources through telehealth, the state hopes to improve convenience for patients and expand provider access, thereby addressing critical gaps in healthcare availability for vulnerable populations, which includes the elderly and rural residents lacking timely services.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB2624 is supportive, with many recognizing the urgent need to address healthcare access in Hawaii. Both legislators and constituents acknowledge the potential of telehealth to bridge gaps exacerbated by geographic and socioeconomic barriers. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the effectiveness of telehealth adoption, particularly around how rapidly it can be integrated into existing practices and whether it meets the expectations of patients and providers alike.

Contention

Despite its supportive framework, the bill has sparked discussions regarding the logistics of implementing telehealth solutions effectively. Some stakeholders are wary of how the pilot projects will operate in practice, especially concerning the adequacy of support staff during telehealth consultations and the range of services offered. Additionally, debates have emerged about the level of financial investment required and the long-term sustainability of such pilot projects beyond initial funding, emphasizing the need for robust evaluation measures as outlined in the bill to assess outcomes and make necessary adjustments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV SB660

Setting forth standard of care requirements for telehealth practice

TX SB488

Relating to the practice of dentistry and the provision of teledentistry dental services.

TX HB2056

Relating to the practice of dentistry and the provision of teledentistry dental services.

TX HB1742

Relating to the practice of dentistry and the provision of teledentistry dental services.

NJ S3631

Permits certain out-of-State mental health practitioners to practice in-State.

TX SB792

Relating to the practice of dentistry and the provision of teledentistry dental services.

TX SB2527

Relating to the regulation of telemedicine medical services, teledentistry services, and telehealth services; providing a civil penalty.

HI HB472

Relating To Telehealth.