Hawaii Senate Bill SB2792

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/22
• Refer: 1/24/22
• Report Pass: 2/9/22
• Refer: 2/9/22
• Report Pass: 3/4/22
• Engrossed: 3/8/22
• Refer: 3/10/22
• Report Pass: 3/22/22
• Refer: 3/22/22
• Report Pass: 4/6/22
• Report Pass: 4/29/22
• Enrolled: 5/3/22

Caption

Relating To Public Employment Cost Items.

Impact

The implementation of SB2792 is expected to positively influence the state's ability to meet its contractual obligations to public employees, particularly those involved in collective bargaining. By providing specific appropriations for salary increases and cost adjustments, the bill is designed to create a stable financial environment that protects against fund lapses. This can lead to improved morale among public employees, as well as better workforce retention and recruitment efforts, given that salary adjustments will be legally backed by state appropriations.

Summary

SB2792 pertains to public employment cost items and addresses funding for collective bargaining agreements negotiated with the exclusive representative of collective bargaining unit (11) in the State of Hawaii. The bill includes provisions for the appropriation of funds for personnel salaries, covering both general and special funds for the fiscal biennium 2021-2023. This legislation seeks to ensure that the necessary financial resources are allocated to support salary adjustments and other cost items stipulated in collective bargaining agreements, reinforcing the state's commitment to its workforce.

Sentiment

Overall, there is a supportive sentiment surrounding SB2792 from stakeholders including public employee unions and advocacy groups. They view the funding appropriations as necessary for sustaining fair wages and operational effectiveness in public services. While there may be discussions regarding the sufficiency and allocation of the funds, the bill generally is perceived favorably as a critical step towards enhancing the welfare of public employees who serve in various capacities within the government.

Contention

Notably, while the bill aims to secure funding for collective bargaining cost items, discussions and potential contention may arise around budgetary constraints and the sources of funding. Some local officials and taxpayers may question the sustainability of these salary increases, particularly in the context of broader state financial health and competing budgetary needs. This could lead to debates about prioritizing public sector salary adjustments versus funding other essential services, highlighting a classic tension in public budget management.