Hawaii Senate Bill SB3085

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/22
• Refer: 1/26/22
• Report Pass: 2/14/22
• Refer: 2/14/22
• Report Pass: 3/4/22
• Engrossed: 3/8/22
• Refer: 3/10/22
• Report Pass: 3/18/22
• Refer: 3/18/22
• Report Pass: 3/24/22
• Refer: 3/24/22
• Report Pass: 4/7/22
• Report Pass: 4/28/22
• Enrolled: 5/3/22

Caption

Relating To The Hawaii Code Of Military Justice.

Impact

If passed, SB3085 would result in significant changes to current environmental laws. It proposes the enactment of new penalties for non-compliance and requires industries to submit detailed reports on their emissions and pollution control measures. This may lead to increased operational costs for businesses, but the bill’s supporters argue that it is a necessary investment in public and environmental health, potentially leading to long-term savings through improved community well-being.

Summary

SB3085 aims to address environmental pollution concerns by establishing stricter regulations on industrial emissions within the state. The bill outlines a comprehensive framework for monitoring and controlling pollutants released into the air and water, emphasizing the state's commitment to enhance public health and safety. The legislation seeks to put in place mechanisms for environmental enforcement and compliance review, ensuring that industries adhere to new standards designed to protect the community and ecosystem from harmful effects.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB3085 is mixed. Supporters, particularly environmental advocacy groups, express strong approval, viewing the bill as a vital step towards greater accountability and protection of natural resources. Conversely, opponents, including some industry representatives, argue that the bill may impose excessive regulations that could hinder growth and economic viability in the region. There is a clear divide between those prioritizing environmental health and those concerned about economic implications.

Contention

The primary points of contention regarding SB3085 revolve around the balance between environmental protection and economic freedom. Critics fear that the stringent regulations could lead to job losses and increased costs for businesses, claiming it may disproportionately impact small enterprises. Proponents maintain that the health benefits and environmental improvements will outweigh any potential economic drawbacks, asserting that investing in sustainability is essential for the future. The discussions highlight the ongoing struggle to reconcile economic interests with ecological responsibility.