Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB3329 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-THE SENATE S.B. NO. 3329 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022 S.D. 1 STATE OF HAWAII H.D. 2 C.D. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
1+THE SENATE S.B. NO. 3329 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022 S.D. 1 STATE OF HAWAII H.D. 2 A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
22
33 THE SENATE S.B. NO. 3329
44 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022 S.D. 1
55 STATE OF HAWAII H.D. 2
6- C.D. 1
76
87 THE SENATE
98
109 S.B. NO.
1110
1211 3329
1312
1413 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022
1514
1615 S.D. 1
1716
1817 STATE OF HAWAII
1918
2019 H.D. 2
2120
2221
2322
24-C.D. 1
23+
2524
2625
2726
2827
2928
3029
3130
3231 A BILL FOR AN ACT
3332
3433
3534
3635
3736
3837 RELATING TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT.
3938
4039
4140
4241
4342
4443 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
4544
4645
4746
48- SECTION 1. The legislature finds that the enactment in 2002 of Hawaii's Citizen Participation in Government Act, codified as chapter 634F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, was intended to promote the rights of citizens to vigorously participate in government and to protect citizens from the chilling effect of retributive strategic lawsuits against public participation or "SLAPP" suits. To minimize the damage of SLAPP claims against citizens, Hawaii's anti-SLAPP law seeks to shift the burden of litigation back to the party bringing the SLAPP claim by providing for expedited judicial review, a stay on discovery, and sanctions. The legislature further finds that despite the broad intentions of the legislature that the law "shall be construed liberally to fully effectuate its purposes and intent", the anti-SLAPP law has not been effective at protecting citizen participation. The Public Participation Project has rated the law as a "C" compared to other state laws, and courts have often declined to apply its procedural protections due to its narrow and confusing provisions. The legislature also finds that the Uniform Law Commission provides states with nonpartisan, well-conceived, and well-drafted legislation that brings clarity and stability to critical areas of state statutory law. In 2020, due to the rise in SLAPP suits nationally and the need to strengthen protection for citizen participation in government and increase consistency among states with anti-SLAPP laws, the Uniform Law Commission proposed the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act as a model act to assist states in modernizing their anti-SLAPP laws. The legislature finds that to protect public participation at all levels of government, the State should adopt the provisions of the model act recommended by the Uniform Law Commission. By adopting the Uniform Act provisions, the State will have an anti-SLAPP law that is among the best in the nation, with procedural protections for all parties, and clearer instructions for the courts on how to fairly and expeditiously dispose of SLAPP claims to ensure citizens are protected from punitive SLAPP suits. The purpose of this Act is to enact the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. SECTION 2. The Hawaii Revised Statutes is amended by adding a new chapter to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "Chapter HAWAII PUBLIC EXPRESSION PROTECTION ACT § -1 Short Title. This chapter may be cited as the Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act. § -2 Scope of chapter. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), this chapter shall apply to a cause of action asserted against a person based on the person's: (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; (2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; or (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Hawaii State Constitution, on a matter of public concern. (b) This chapter shall not apply to a cause of action asserted: (1) Against a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting or purporting to act in an official capacity; (2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety; or (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the person's sale or lease of the goods or services. (c) As used in this section: "Goods or services" does not include a dramatic, literary, musical, political, journalistic, or artistic work. "Governmental unit" means a public corporation or government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality. "Person" means an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity. § -3 Required procedures; motions; stays. (a) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including rules of the court, no later than sixty days after a party is served with a complaint, crossclaim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action to which this chapter applies, or at a later time on a showing of good cause, the party may file a special motion to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action. (b) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (1) All other proceedings between the moving party and responding party in an action, including discovery and a pending hearing or motion, shall be stayed upon the filing of a motion under subsection (a); and (2) On motion by the moving party, the court may stay: (A) A hearing or motion involving another party if the ruling on the hearing or motion would adjudicate a legal or factual issue that is material to the motion under subsection (a); or (B) Discovery by another party if the discovery relates to the issue. (c) A stay under subsection (b) shall remain in effect until entry of an order ruling on the motion filed under subsection (a) and the expiration of the time to appeal the order. (d) If a party appeals from an order ruling on a motion filed under subsection (a), all proceedings between all parties in an action shall be stayed. The stay shall remain in effect until the conclusion of the appeal. (e) During a stay under subsection (b), the court may allow limited discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy the burden imposed by section ‑6(a) and is not reasonably available without discovery. (f) A motion for costs and expenses under section ‑9 shall not be subject to a stay under this section. (g) A stay under this section shall not affect a party's ability to voluntarily dismiss a cause of action or part of a cause of action or move to sever a cause of action. (h) During a stay under this section, the court for good cause may hear and rule on a motion: (1) Unrelated to the motion under subsection (a); and (2) Seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety. § -4 Expedited hearings. (a) The court shall hear a motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing: (1) To allow discovery under section -3(e); or (2) For other good cause. (b) If the court orders a later hearing under subsection (a)(1), the court shall hear the motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after the court order allowing the discovery, subject to subsection (a)(2). § -5 Evidence. In ruling on a motion under section ‑3(a), the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in ruling on a motion for summary judgment under the applicable Hawaii rules of civil procedure. § -6 Dismissal of cause of action. (a) In ruling on a motion under section -3(a), the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action or part of a cause of action if: (1) The moving party establishes under section -2(a) that this chapter applies; (2) The responding party fails to establish under section ‑2(b) that this chapter does not apply; and (3) Either: (A) The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action; or (B) The moving party establishes that: (i) The responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted; or (ii) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action or part of the cause of action. (b) A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under section -3(a) shall not affect a moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses under section ‑9. (c) A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under section -3(a) shall establish for the purpose of section ‑9 that the moving party prevailed on the motion. § -7 Court ruling. The court shall rule on a motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after the hearing under section -4. § -8 Appeal. A moving party may appeal within thirty days as a matter of right from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion under section -3(a). § -9 Costs, attorney's fees, and expenses. On a motion under section -3(a) the court shall award costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the motion: (1) To the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion; or (2) To the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding. § -10 Rule of construction. This chapter shall be construed liberally to fully effectuate its purposes and intent to protect the exercise of the right of freedom of speech and of the press, the right to assemble and petition, and the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or Hawaii State Constitution. § -11 Uniformity of application and construction. In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it." SECTION 3. Chapter 634F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed. SECTION 4. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
47+ SECTION 1. The legislature finds that the enactment in 2002 of Hawaii's Citizen Participation in Government Act, codified as chapter 634F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, was intended to promote the rights of citizens to vigorously participate in government and to protect citizens from the chilling effect of retributive strategic lawsuits against public participation or "SLAPP" suits. To minimize the damage of SLAPP claims against citizens, Hawaii's anti-SLAPP law seeks to shift the burden of litigation back to the party bringing the SLAPP claim by providing for expedited judicial review, a stay on discovery, and sanctions. The legislature further finds that despite the broad intentions of the legislature that the law "shall be construed liberally to fully effectuate its purposes and intent", the anti-SLAPP law has not been effective at protecting citizen participation. The Public Participation Project has rated the law as a "C" compared to other state laws, and courts have often declined to apply its procedural protections due to its narrow and confusing provisions. The legislature also finds that the Uniform Law Commission provides states with nonpartisan, well-conceived, and well-drafted legislation that brings clarity and stability to critical areas of state statutory law. In 2020, due to the rise in SLAPP suits nationally and the need to strengthen protection for citizen participation in government and increase consistency among states with anti-SLAPP laws, the Uniform Law Commission proposed the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act as a model act to assist states in modernizing their anti-SLAPP laws. The legislature finds that to protect public participation at all levels of government, the State should adopt the provisions of the model act recommended by the Uniform Law Commission. By adopting the Uniform Act provisions, the State will have an anti-SLAPP law that is among the best in the nation, with procedural protections for all parties, and clearer instructions for the courts on how to fairly and expeditiously dispose of SLAPP claims to ensure citizens are protected from punitive SLAPP suits. The purpose of this Act is to enact the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. SECTION 2. The Hawaii Revised Statutes is amended by adding a new chapter to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "Chapter HAWAII PUBLIC EXPRESSION PROTECTION ACT § -1 Short Title. This chapter may be cited as the Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act. § -2 Scope of chapter. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), this chapter shall apply to a cause of action asserted against a person based on the person's: (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; (2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; or (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Hawaii State Constitution, on a matter of public concern. (b) This chapter shall not apply to a cause of action asserted: (1) Against a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting or purporting to act in an official capacity; (2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety; or (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the person's sale or lease of the goods or services. (c) As used in this section: "Goods or services" does not include a dramatic, literary, musical, political, journalistic, or artistic work. "Governmental unit" means a public corporation or government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality. "Person" means an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity. § -3 Required procedures; motions; stays. (a) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including rules of the court, no later than sixty days after a party is served with a complaint, crossclaim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action to which this chapter applies, or at a later time on a showing of good cause, the party may file a special motion to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action. (b) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (1) All other proceedings between the moving party and responding party in an action, including discovery and a pending hearing or motion, shall be stayed upon the filing of a motion under subsection (a); and (2) On motion by the moving party, the court may stay: (A) A hearing or motion involving another party if the ruling on the hearing or motion would adjudicate a legal or factual issue that is material to the motion under subsection (a); or (B) Discovery by another party if the discovery relates to the issue. (c) A stay under subsection (b) shall remain in effect until entry of an order ruling on the motion filed under subsection (a) and the expiration of the time to appeal the order. (d) If a party appeals from an order ruling on a motion filed under subsection (a), all proceedings between all parties in an action shall be stayed. The stay shall remain in effect until the conclusion of the appeal. (e) During a stay under subsection (b), the court may allow limited discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy the burden imposed by section ‑6(a) and is not reasonably available without discovery. (f) A motion for costs and expenses under section ‑9 shall not be subject to a stay under this section. (g) A stay under this section shall not affect a party's ability to voluntarily dismiss a cause of action or part of a cause of action or move to sever a cause of action. (h) During a stay under this section, the court for good cause may hear and rule on a motion: (1) Unrelated to the motion under subsection (a); and (2) Seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety. § -4 Expedited hearings. (a) The court shall hear a motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing: (1) To allow discovery under section -3(e); or (2) For other good cause. (b) If the court orders a later hearing under subsection (a)(1), the court shall hear the motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after the court order allowing the discovery, subject to subsection (a)(2). § -5 Evidence. In ruling on a motion under section ‑3(a), the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in ruling on a motion for summary judgment under the applicable Hawaii rules of civil procedure. § -6 Dismissal of cause of action. (a) In ruling on a motion under section -3(a), the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action or part of a cause of action if: (1) The moving party establishes under section -2(a) that this chapter applies; (2) The responding party fails to establish under section ‑2(b) that this chapter does not apply; and (3) Either: (A) The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action; or (B) The moving party establishes that: (i) The responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted; or (ii) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action or part of the cause of action. (b) A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under section -3(a) shall not affect a moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses under section ‑9. (c) A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under section -3(a) shall establish for the purpose of section ‑9 that the moving party prevailed on the motion. § -7 Court ruling. The court shall rule on a motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after the hearing under section -4. § -8 Appeal. A moving party may appeal within thirty days as a matter of right from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion under section -3(a). § -9 Costs, attorney's fees, and expenses. On a motion under section -3(a) the court shall award costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the motion: (1) To the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion; or (2) To the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding. § -10 Rule of construction. This chapter shall be construed liberally to fully effectuate its purposes and intent to protect the exercise of the right of freedom of speech and of the press, the right to assemble and petition, and the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or Hawaii State Constitution. § -11 Uniformity of application and construction. In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it." SECTION 3. Chapter 634F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed. SECTION 4. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2112.
4948
5049 SECTION 1. The legislature finds that the enactment in 2002 of Hawaii's Citizen Participation in Government Act, codified as chapter 634F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, was intended to promote the rights of citizens to vigorously participate in government and to protect citizens from the chilling effect of retributive strategic lawsuits against public participation or "SLAPP" suits. To minimize the damage of SLAPP claims against citizens, Hawaii's anti-SLAPP law seeks to shift the burden of litigation back to the party bringing the SLAPP claim by providing for expedited judicial review, a stay on discovery, and sanctions.
5150
5251 The legislature further finds that despite the broad intentions of the legislature that the law "shall be construed liberally to fully effectuate its purposes and intent", the anti-SLAPP law has not been effective at protecting citizen participation. The Public Participation Project has rated the law as a "C" compared to other state laws, and courts have often declined to apply its procedural protections due to its narrow and confusing provisions.
5352
5453 The legislature also finds that the Uniform Law Commission provides states with nonpartisan, well-conceived, and well-drafted legislation that brings clarity and stability to critical areas of state statutory law. In 2020, due to the rise in SLAPP suits nationally and the need to strengthen protection for citizen participation in government and increase consistency among states with anti-SLAPP laws, the Uniform Law Commission proposed the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act as a model act to assist states in modernizing their anti-SLAPP laws.
5554
5655 The legislature finds that to protect public participation at all levels of government, the State should adopt the provisions of the model act recommended by the Uniform Law Commission. By adopting the Uniform Act provisions, the State will have an anti-SLAPP law that is among the best in the nation, with procedural protections for all parties, and clearer instructions for the courts on how to fairly and expeditiously dispose of SLAPP claims to ensure citizens are protected from punitive SLAPP suits.
5756
5857 The purpose of this Act is to enact the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act.
5958
6059 SECTION 2. The Hawaii Revised Statutes is amended by adding a new chapter to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
6160
6261 "Chapter
6362
6463 HAWAII PUBLIC EXPRESSION PROTECTION ACT
6564
6665 § -1 Short Title. This chapter may be cited as the Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act.
6766
6867 § -2 Scope of chapter. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), this chapter shall apply to a cause of action asserted against a person based on the person's:
6968
7069 (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding;
7170
7271 (2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; or
7372
7473 (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Hawaii State Constitution, on a matter of public concern.
7574
7675 (b) This chapter shall not apply to a cause of action asserted:
7776
7877 (1) Against a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting or purporting to act in an official capacity;
7978
8079 (2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety; or
8180
8281 (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the person's sale or lease of the goods or services.
8382
8483 (c) As used in this section:
8584
8685 "Goods or services" does not include a dramatic, literary, musical, political, journalistic, or artistic work.
8786
8887 "Governmental unit" means a public corporation or government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality.
8988
9089 "Person" means an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity.
9190
9291 § -3 Required procedures; motions; stays. (a) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including rules of the court, no later than sixty days after a party is served with a complaint, crossclaim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action to which this chapter applies, or at a later time on a showing of good cause, the party may file a special motion to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action.
9392
9493 (b) Except as otherwise provided in this section:
9594
9695 (1) All other proceedings between the moving party and responding party in an action, including discovery and a pending hearing or motion, shall be stayed upon the filing of a motion under subsection (a); and
9796
9897 (2) On motion by the moving party, the court may stay:
9998
10099 (A) A hearing or motion involving another party if the ruling on the hearing or motion would adjudicate a legal or factual issue that is material to the motion under subsection (a); or
101100
102101 (B) Discovery by another party if the discovery relates to the issue.
103102
104103 (c) A stay under subsection (b) shall remain in effect until entry of an order ruling on the motion filed under subsection (a) and the expiration of the time to appeal the order.
105104
106105 (d) If a party appeals from an order ruling on a motion filed under subsection (a), all proceedings between all parties in an action shall be stayed. The stay shall remain in effect until the conclusion of the appeal.
107106
108107 (e) During a stay under subsection (b), the court may allow limited discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy the burden imposed by section ‑6(a) and is not reasonably available without discovery.
109108
110109 (f) A motion for costs and expenses under section ‑9 shall not be subject to a stay under this section.
111110
112111 (g) A stay under this section shall not affect a party's ability to voluntarily dismiss a cause of action or part of a cause of action or move to sever a cause of action.
113112
114113 (h) During a stay under this section, the court for good cause may hear and rule on a motion:
115114
116115 (1) Unrelated to the motion under subsection (a); and
117116
118117 (2) Seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.
119118
120119 § -4 Expedited hearings. (a) The court shall hear a motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing:
121120
122121 (1) To allow discovery under section -3(e); or
123122
124123 (2) For other good cause.
125124
126125 (b) If the court orders a later hearing under subsection (a)(1), the court shall hear the motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after the court order allowing the discovery, subject to subsection (a)(2).
127126
128127 § -5 Evidence. In ruling on a motion under section ‑3(a), the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in ruling on a motion for summary judgment under the applicable Hawaii rules of civil procedure.
129128
130129 § -6 Dismissal of cause of action. (a) In ruling on a motion under section -3(a), the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action or part of a cause of action if:
131130
132131 (1) The moving party establishes under section -2(a) that this chapter applies;
133132
134133 (2) The responding party fails to establish under section ‑2(b) that this chapter does not apply; and
135134
136135 (3) Either:
137136
138137 (A) The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action; or
139138
140139 (B) The moving party establishes that:
141140
142141 (i) The responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted; or
143142
144143 (ii) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action or part of the cause of action.
145144
146145 (b) A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under section -3(a) shall not affect a moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses under section ‑9.
147146
148147 (c) A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under section -3(a) shall establish for the purpose of section ‑9 that the moving party prevailed on the motion.
149148
150149 § -7 Court ruling. The court shall rule on a motion under section -3(a) no later than sixty days after the hearing under section -4.
151150
152151 § -8 Appeal. A moving party may appeal within thirty days as a matter of right from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion under section -3(a).
153152
154153 § -9 Costs, attorney's fees, and expenses. On a motion under section -3(a) the court shall award costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the motion:
155154
156155 (1) To the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion; or
157156
158157 (2) To the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding.
159158
160159 § -10 Rule of construction. This chapter shall be construed liberally to fully effectuate its purposes and intent to protect the exercise of the right of freedom of speech and of the press, the right to assemble and petition, and the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or Hawaii State Constitution.
161160
162161 § -11 Uniformity of application and construction. In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it."
163162
164163 SECTION 3. Chapter 634F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is repealed.
165164
166165 SECTION 4. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
167166
168- SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
167+ SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2112.
169168
170- Report Title: Public Participation in Government; Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act; SLAPP Suits Description: Repeals the Citizen Participation in Government Act. Enacts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. (CD1) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
169+ Report Title: Public Participation in Government; Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act; SLAPP Suits Description: Repeals the Citizen Participation in Government Act. Enacts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. Effective 7/1/2112. (HD2) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
171170
172171
173172
174173 Report Title:
175174
176175 Public Participation in Government; Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act; SLAPP Suits
177176
178177
179178
180179 Description:
181180
182-Repeals the Citizen Participation in Government Act. Enacts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. (CD1)
181+Repeals the Citizen Participation in Government Act. Enacts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. Effective 7/1/2112. (HD2)
183182
184183
185184
186185
187186
188187
189188
190189 The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.