The bill mandates that solitary confinement can only be used as a last resort and under specific conditions that justify its necessity. It requires that less restrictive alternatives be thoroughly considered before placement in solitary confinement. Additionally, facilities must comply with new review processes to ensure that the confinement is continuously justified and humane, as well as regular evaluations of inmates placed in solitary confinement to determine their mental health status and suitability for confinement. These measures aim to reduce the number of inmates subjected to solitary conditions, making reforms to align with evolving standards for the treatment of prisoners.
SB3344 aims to restrict the use of solitary confinement in state-operated and state-contracted correctional facilities, especially for vulnerable populations, such as youth, elderly inmates, and those with mental health conditions. The bill highlights the detrimental psychological and physical effects of solitary confinement, which is associated with increased risks of suicide, anxiety, and other negative outcomes both during and after incarceration. The legislature acknowledges that solitary confinement often fails to achieve its intended purpose of rehabilitation and poses a significant risk to the well-being of inmates.
While supporters argue that the bill promotes humane treatment of inmates and aligns with modern correctional standards, some oppose it, fearing that restrictions could limit the ability of correctional facilities to manage inmates who may pose a danger to themselves or others. This discourse reflects broader tensions within the legal system regarding the balance between safety and rehabilitation versus the risks of inhumane treatment and psychological damage caused by excessive use of solitary confinement.