Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB632 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 632 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to the family court. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 632
4	4	THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	THE SENATE
8	8
9	9	S.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	632
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2021
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	relating to the family court.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays experienced by parents and children while awaiting the disposition of appeals from family court decisions could arguably violate the due process clauses of both the state and federal constitutions. Such delays conflict with the mission of the family court, which, as stated on the family court's website, is "to provide a fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children." The legislature further finds that in recent years, some parents and children have had to wait up to eight years for their cases to be resolved. For example, the delays between the filing of the family court order and the decision by the supreme court have lasted as long as: (1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016); (2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and (3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468,(2016). Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities if the matter to be decided becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeals process. Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite the process for appealing family court orders by making the orders appealable directly to the supreme court instead of to the intermediate court of appeals. SECTION 2. Section 571-54, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: "§571-54 Appeal. (a) An interested party, aggrieved by any order or decree of the court, may appeal to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court for review of questions of law and fact upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602, except as hereinafter provided. Where the decree or order affects the custody of a child or minor, the appeal shall be heard at the earliest practicable time. In cases under section 571-11, the record on appeal shall be given a fictitious title, to safeguard against publication of the names of the children or minors involved. (b) The stay of enforcement of an order or decree, or the pendency of an appeal, shall not suspend the order or decree of the court regarding a child or minor, or discharge the child or minor from the custody of the court or of the person, institution, or agency to whose care the child or minor has been committed, unless otherwise ordered by the family court or by the [appellate] supreme court after an appeal is taken. Pending final disposition of the case, the family court or the [appellate] supreme court, after the appeal is taken, may make such order for temporary custody as is appropriate in the circumstances. If the [appellate] supreme court does not dismiss the proceedings and discharge the child or minor, it shall affirm or modify the order of the family court and remand the child or minor to the jurisdiction of the court for disposition not inconsistent with the appellate court's finding on the appeal. (c) An order or decree entered in a proceeding based upon section 571-11(1), (2), or (6) shall be subject to appeal only as follows: Within twenty days from the date of the entry of any such order or decree, any party directly affected thereby may file a motion for a reconsideration of the facts involved. The motion and any supporting affidavit shall set forth the grounds on which a reconsideration is requested and shall be sworn to by the movant or the movant's representative. The judge shall hold a hearing on the motion, affording to all parties concerned the full right of representation by counsel and presentation of relevant evidence. The findings of the judge upon the hearing of the motion and the judge's determination and disposition of the case thereafter, and any decision, judgment, order, or decree affecting the child and entered as a result of the hearing on the motion, shall be set forth in writing and signed by the judge. Any party aggrieved by [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court, upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602; provided that no [such] motion for reconsideration shall operate as a stay of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree unless the judge of the family court so orders; and provided further that no informality or technical irregularity in the proceedings prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration shall constitute grounds for the reversal of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree by the [appellate] supreme court." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays experienced by parents and children while awaiting the disposition of appeals from family court decisions could arguably violate the due process clauses of both the state and federal constitutions. Such delays conflict with the mission of the family court, which, as stated on the family court's website, is "to provide a fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children."
50	50
51	51	The legislature further finds that in recent years, some parents and children have had to wait up to eight years for their cases to be resolved. For example, the delays between the filing of the family court order and the decision by the supreme court have lasted as long as:
52	52
53	53	(1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016);
54	54
55	55	(2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and
56	56
57	57	(3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468,(2016).
58	58
59	59	Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities if the matter to be decided becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeals process.
60	60
61	61	Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite the process for appealing family court orders by making the orders appealable directly to the supreme court instead of to the intermediate court of appeals.
62	62
63	63	SECTION 2. Section 571-54, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
64	64
65	65	"§571-54 Appeal. (a) An interested party, aggrieved by any order or decree of the court, may appeal to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court for review of questions of law and fact upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602, except as hereinafter provided. Where the decree or order affects the custody of a child or minor, the appeal shall be heard at the earliest practicable time. In cases under section 571-11, the record on appeal shall be given a fictitious title, to safeguard against publication of the names of the children or minors involved.
66	66
67	67	(b) The stay of enforcement of an order or decree, or the pendency of an appeal, shall not suspend the order or decree of the court regarding a child or minor, or discharge the child or minor from the custody of the court or of the person, institution, or agency to whose care the child or minor has been committed, unless otherwise ordered by the family court or by the [appellate] supreme court after an appeal is taken. Pending final disposition of the case, the family court or the [appellate] supreme court, after the appeal is taken, may make such order for temporary custody as is appropriate in the circumstances. If the [appellate] supreme court does not dismiss the proceedings and discharge the child or minor, it shall affirm or modify the order of the family court and remand the child or minor to the jurisdiction of the court for disposition not inconsistent with the appellate court's finding on the appeal.
68	68
69	69	(c) An order or decree entered in a proceeding based upon section 571-11(1), (2), or (6) shall be subject to appeal only as follows:
70	70
71	71	Within twenty days from the date of the entry of any such order or decree, any party directly affected thereby may file a motion for a reconsideration of the facts involved. The motion and any supporting affidavit shall set forth the grounds on which a reconsideration is requested and shall be sworn to by the movant or the movant's representative. The judge shall hold a hearing on the motion, affording to all parties concerned the full right of representation by counsel and presentation of relevant evidence. The findings of the judge upon the hearing of the motion and the judge's determination and disposition of the case thereafter, and any decision, judgment, order, or decree affecting the child and entered as a result of the hearing on the motion, shall be set forth in writing and signed by the judge. Any party aggrieved by [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the [intermediate appellate] supreme court, upon the same terms and conditions as in other cases in the circuit court, and review shall be governed by chapter 602; provided that no [such] motion for reconsideration shall operate as a stay of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree unless the judge of the family court so orders; and provided further that no informality or technical irregularity in the proceedings prior to the hearing on the motion for reconsideration shall constitute grounds for the reversal of [any such] the findings, judgment, order, or decree by the [appellate] supreme court."
72	72
73	73	SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
74	74
75	75	SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
76	76
77	77	SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
78	78
79	79
80	80
81	81	INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
82	82
83	83	INTRODUCED BY:
84	84
85	85	_____________________________
86	86
87	87
88	88
89	89
90	90
91	91	Report Title: Family Court; Supreme Court Description: Makes decisions of the family court appealable to the supreme court instead of the intermediate court of appeals. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
92	92
93	93
94	94
95	95
96	96
97	97	Report Title:
98	98
99	99	Family Court; Supreme Court
100	100
101	101
102	102
103	103	Description:
104	104
105	105	Makes decisions of the family court appealable to the supreme court instead of the intermediate court of appeals.
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109
110	110
111	111
112	112
113	113	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.