Relating To Board Members.
The bill's provisions apply during a declared state of emergency, allowing boards to waive in-person meeting requirements if the risk of health hazards persists. While a board can exclude the public from physical meeting locations, it must still ensure that at least one location is available for public access and that remote viewing options are provided. This mechanism is designed to facilitate public participation while mitigating health risks associated with in-person gatherings.
Senate Bill 9 (SB9) relates to the governance of board meetings during states of emergency, particularly concerning infectious diseases. It amends Chapter 92 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to allow boards to conduct meetings using interactive conference technology without the requirement that these meetings be open to the public in person, provided that specific safety concerns justify such actions. This flexibility aims to protect public health while maintaining necessary governmental functions during declared emergencies.
A significant point of contention surrounding SB9 is the potential impact on public transparency and accountability. Critics argue that limiting public access to meetings, even in times of emergency, could hinder community involvement and oversight of board activities. Supporters contend that the health risks associated with in-person meetings during a crisis justify the need for this flexibility, as it allows governmental bodies to function without compromising public safety. The bill also introduces new requirements for public notice and engagement, including provisions for remote testimony, which some see as a positive enhancement of participatory governance.