Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SCR190 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 THE SENATE S.C.R. NO. 190 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022 STATE OF HAWAII SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BUREAU TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF POTENTIAL POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTING TERM LIMITS FOR MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE.
22
33 THE SENATE S.C.R. NO. 190
44 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022
55 STATE OF HAWAII
66
77 THE SENATE
88
99 S.C.R. NO.
1010
1111 190
1212
1313 THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2022
1414
1515
1616
1717 STATE OF HAWAII
1818
1919
2020
2121
2222
2323
2424
2525
2626
2727
2828
2929 SENATE CONCURRENT
3030
3131 RESOLUTION
3232
3333
3434
3535
3636
3737 REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE BUREAU TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF POTENTIAL POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTING TERM LIMITS FOR MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE.
3838
3939
4040
4141
4242
4343 WHEREAS, when the United States Supreme Court decided in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), that certain campaign spending limits were unconstitutional, the ability of nonincumbents to challenge elected officials was substantially impaired; and WHEREAS, in 1974, the year of the only Hawaii election that observed spending limits, twenty-two new members were elected to the House of Representatives and eight new members were elected to the Senate; in other words, forty-three percent of the representatives and thirty-two percent of the senators elected in 1974 were new to the Legislature; and WHEREAS, fifteen States have imposed term limits on state legislators: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Dakota; and WHEREAS, thirty-six states have imposed term limits on their governors; and WHEREAS, thirty-three states have imposed term limits on their members in the United States Congress; and WHEREAS, the legislatures of Idaho and Utah have repealed term limits on state legislators; and WHEREAS, the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming have invalidated term limits on state legislators due to procedural concerns, and not the merits of the applicable laws; and WHEREAS, the expenses for nonincumbents seeking election to the Legislature and the small chance of winning reduce the number of seriously contested races, which may increase voter apathy and undermine the entire foundation and process of representative democracy; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the Thirty-first Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2022, the House of Representatives concurring, that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to conduct a study of potential positive and negative consequences of implementing term limits for members of the Legislature; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to report its findings to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the Regular Session of 2023; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to the Director of the Legislative Reference Bureau. OFFERED BY: _____________________________ By Request Report Title: Legislators; Senators; Representatives; Term Limits; Study
4444
4545 WHEREAS, when the United States Supreme Court decided in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), that certain campaign spending limits were unconstitutional, the ability of nonincumbents to challenge elected officials was substantially impaired; and
4646
4747
4848
4949 WHEREAS, in 1974, the year of the only Hawaii election that observed spending limits, twenty-two new members were elected to the House of Representatives and eight new members were elected to the Senate; in other words, forty-three percent of the representatives and thirty-two percent of the senators elected in 1974 were new to the Legislature; and
5050
5151
5252
5353 WHEREAS, fifteen States have imposed term limits on state legislators: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Dakota; and
5454
5555
5656
5757 WHEREAS, thirty-six states have imposed term limits on their governors; and
5858
5959
6060
6161 WHEREAS, thirty-three states have imposed term limits on their members in the United States Congress; and
6262
6363
6464
6565 WHEREAS, the legislatures of Idaho and Utah have repealed term limits on state legislators; and
6666
6767
6868
6969 WHEREAS, the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming have invalidated term limits on state legislators due to procedural concerns, and not the merits of the applicable laws; and
7070
7171
7272
7373 WHEREAS, the expenses for nonincumbents seeking election to the Legislature and the small chance of winning reduce the number of seriously contested races, which may increase voter apathy and undermine the entire foundation and process of representative democracy; now, therefore,
7474
7575
7676
7777 BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the Thirty-first Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2022, the House of Representatives concurring, that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to conduct a study of potential positive and negative consequences of implementing term limits for members of the Legislature; and
7878
7979
8080
8181 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to report its findings to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the Regular Session of 2023; and
8282
8383
8484
8585 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to the Director of the Legislative Reference Bureau.
8686
8787
8888
8989
9090
9191
9292
9393 OFFERED BY: _____________________________
9494 By Request
9595
9696
9797
9898 OFFERED BY:
9999
100100 _____________________________
101101
102102
103103
104104 By Request
105105
106106 Report Title:
107107
108108 Legislators; Senators; Representatives; Term Limits; Study