Hawaii Senate Bill SCR48

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/22
• Refer: 3/11/22
• Report Pass: 4/5/22
• Engrossed: 4/6/22
• Refer: 4/7/22
• Report Pass: 4/18/22
• Passed: 4/19/22

Caption

Requesting The Public Utilities Commission, In Consultation With The Division Of Consumer Advocacy, To Consider Efforts To Mitigate High Energy Burdens For Low- And Moderate-income Customers And Investigate How To Integrate Considerations Of Energy Equity And Justice Across Its Work.

Impact

The implications of SCR48 may lead to significant reforms in how energy rates and assistance programs are structured within the state. Specifically, the resolution calls for the PUC to evaluate potential discounts and bill credits for low- and moderate-income customers, as well as investigate the expansion of existing utility bill assistance programs. It also emphasizes the need for protective measures to prevent disconnections for financially strained households, senior citizens, and families with infants. This proactive approach aims to enhance access to energy for the most at-risk demographics.

Summary

SCR48, a Senate Concurrent Resolution from the Thirty-first Legislature of Hawaii in 2022, seeks to address the challenges faced by low- and moderate-income households regarding energy affordability and security. The measure requests the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), in consultation with the Division of Consumer Advocacy, to explore methods for alleviating high energy costs impacting these vulnerable populations and to analyze how energy equity and justice considerations can be woven into their operations. The resolution highlights substantial disparities in energy expenses, emphasizing the pressing need for interventions to support those disproportionately affected by high electricity rates.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR48 appears largely supportive, with recognition from various stakeholders about the urgency of addressing energy affordability. Many see it as a vital step towards fostering greater economic justice and ensuring that all residents, regardless of income, can maintain access to essential electrical services. However, there may also be some concerns from utility companies about the operational and financial ramifications of implementing such discounts and assistance programs, suggesting that further dialogue will be necessary to balance interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the practicality of implementing proposed measures and the potential impact on utility companies’ revenue structures. While proponents of the bill advocate for equitable energy solutions, there are concerns about how these measures will be funded and the long-term sustainability of utility service under a revised rate structure. Additionally, the resolution hints at the complexities involved in integrating energy equity considerations into broader utility operations, which could face significant regulatory challenges as discussions unfold.