Hawaii Senate Bill SR43

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/22
• Refer: 3/11/22
• Report Pass: 4/5/22
• Passed: 4/6/22

Caption

Requesting The Public Utilities Commission, In Consultation With The Division Of Consumer Advocacy, To Consider Efforts To Mitigate High Energy Burdens For Low- And Moderate-income Customers And Investigate How To Integrate Considerations Of Energy Equity And Justice Across Its Work.

Impact

The resolution specifically urges the PUC to consider various measures including low-income rate discounts, expanded bill assistance programs, and protective measures against service disconnections for vulnerable populations, including seniors and families with infants. This legislative action represents a significant step toward prioritizing energy equity, aiming to ensure that every resident has access to affordable energy solutions regardless of their financial situation. The ongoing assessment is positioned to influence policy changes that could enhance consumer protections in the energy sector.

Summary

Senate Resolution 43 (SR43) was passed by the Senate of Hawaii to address the high energy burdens faced by low- and moderate-income households. The resolution calls upon the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to assess and develop approaches that can alleviate these financial pressures. It highlights the challenges of energy insecurity faced by families, particularly as Hawaii's electricity rates are among the highest in the nation, causing significant hardship for households trying to balance their budgets between essential needs such as food and utilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR43 appears supportive, especially among advocates for social justice and energy equity. Stakeholders acknowledge the necessity of mitigating energy burdens on vulnerable populations, particularly in light of increased energy demands exacerbated by climate change and economic instability. However, tensions may exist in the discussion on how to balance utility costs while implementing these measures, pointing to an awareness that meaningful changes will require careful consideration of costs and benefits across the community.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise in how the PUC's examination and subsequent recommendations will be implemented. There is a potential for debate regarding funding sources for the proposed low-income programs and the implications of introducing rate discounts on utility revenues. Additionally, the resolution does not provide a definitive timeline for changes, and stakeholders will need to consider the impact of any delayed action on already burdened households seeking immediate assistance.