| 47 | | - | SECTION 1. The legislature finds that the procurement of professional services pursuant to section 103D-304, Hawaii Revised Statutes, currently requires a selection committee to rank a minimum of three persons based on the selection criteria and send the ranking to the head of the purchasing agency to begin negotiations. This requirement was upheld in Asato v. Procurement Policy Board, 322 P.3d 228 (Haw. S. Ct. 2014). However, when an agency procures professional services and does not receive the requisite number of responses, it must continue to re-solicit. This forces the procuring official to continue expending time and resources to fulfill the solicitation and, if the requisite number of responses is never received, leaves the agency no options to proceed. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to allow agencies to rank fewer than three persons for professional services when fewer than three qualified persons respond to the solicitation or request to use alternative procurement procedures when no qualified person responds to the solicitation. SECTION 2. Section 103D-304, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: "§103D-304 Procurement of professional services. (a) Professional services shall be procured in accordance with sections 103D-302, 103D-303, 103D-305, 103D-306, or 103D-307, or this section; provided that design professional services furnished by licensees under chapter 464 shall be procured pursuant to this section or section 103D-307. Contracts for professional services shall be awarded on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualification for the type of services required, and at fair and reasonable prices. (b) At a minimum, before the beginning of each fiscal year, the head of each purchasing agency shall publish a notice inviting persons engaged in providing professional services [which] that the agency anticipates needing in the next fiscal year, to submit current statements of qualifications and expressions of interest to the agency. Additional notices shall be given if: (1) The response to the initial notice is inadequate; (2) The response to the initial notice does not result in adequate representation of available sources; (3) New needs for professional services arise; or (4) Rules adopted by the policy board so specify. The chief procurement officer may specify a uniform format for statements of qualifications. Persons may amend these statements by filing a new statement prior to the date designated for submission. (c) The head of the purchasing agency shall designate a review committee consisting of a minimum of three persons with sufficient education, training, and licenses or credentials for each type of professional service [which] that may be required. In designating the members of the review committee, the head of the purchasing agency shall ensure the impartiality and independence of committee members. The names of the members of the review committee established under this section shall be placed in the contract file. The committee shall review and evaluate all submissions and other pertinent information, including references and reports, and prepare a list of qualified persons to provide these services. Persons included on the list of qualified persons may amend their statements of qualifications as necessary or appropriate. Persons shall immediately inform the head of the purchasing agency of any change in information furnished [which] that would disqualify the person from being considered for a contract award. (d) Whenever during the course of the fiscal year the agency needs a particular professional service, the head of the purchasing agency shall designate a selection committee to evaluate the statements of qualification and performance data of those persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) along with any other pertinent information, including references and reports. The selection committee shall be comprised of a minimum of three persons with sufficient education, training, and licenses or credentials in the area of the services required. In designating the members of the selection committee, the head of the purchasing agency shall ensure the impartiality and independence of committee members. The names of the members of a selection committee established under this section shall be placed in the contract file. (e) The selection criteria employed in descending order of importance shall be: (1) Experience and professional qualifications relevant to the project type; (2) Past performance on projects of similar scope for public agencies or private industry, including corrective actions and other responses to notices of deficiencies; (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time; and (4) Any additional criteria determined in writing by the selection committee to be relevant to the purchasing agency's needs or necessary and appropriate to ensure full, open, and fair competition for professional services contracts. (f) The selection committee shall evaluate the submissions of persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) and any other pertinent information [which] that may be available to the agency, against the selection criteria. The committee may conduct confidential discussions with any person who is included on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) regarding the services [which] that are required and the services they are able to provide. In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from the competing professional service offerors. (g) The selection committee shall rank a minimum of three persons based on the selection criteria and send the ranking to the head of the purchasing agency. The contract file shall contain a copy of the summary of qualifications for the ranking of each of the persons provided to the head of the purchasing agency for contract negotiations. If more than one person holds the same qualifications under this section, the selection committee shall rank the persons in a manner that ensures equal distribution of contracts among the persons holding the same qualifications. The recommendations of the selection committee shall not be overturned without due cause. (h) The head of the purchasing agency or designee shall negotiate a contract with the first ranked person, including a rate of compensation [which] that is fair and reasonable, established in writing, and based upon the estimated value, scope, complexity, and nature of the services to be rendered. If a satisfactory contract cannot be negotiated with the first ranked person, negotiations with that person shall be formally terminated and negotiations with the second ranked person on the list shall commence. The contract file shall include documentation from the head of the purchasing agency, or designee, to support selection of other than the first ranked or next ranked person. Failing accord with the second ranked person, negotiations with the next ranked person on the list shall commence. If a contract at a fair and reasonable price cannot be negotiated, the selection committee may be asked to submit a minimum of three additional persons for the head of the purchasing agency to resume negotiations in the same manner provided in this subsection. Negotiations shall be conducted confidentially. (i) If, after thirty days, fewer than three qualified persons respond to the additional notice of need posted pursuant to subsection (b), the purchasing agency may submit a request to the chief procurement officer for approval to proceed under this subsection. The request shall include the dates of all solicitation notices and names of qualified persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c). Submissions shall be evaluated in accordance with subsections (d), (e), and (f); provided that: (1) For two qualified persons, the selection committee shall rank the qualified persons based on the criteria in subsection (e). If both persons hold the same qualifications, the selection committee shall rank the persons in a manner that ensures equal distribution of contracts among persons holding the same qualifications. The ranking shall be provided to the head of the purchasing agency for negotiations conducted in the manner set forth in subsection (h). The rankings of the selection committee shall not be overturned without due cause; (2) For one qualified person, the selection committee shall first evaluate the person's qualifications and may then provide the name of the person to the head of the purchasing agency to negotiate a contract at a fair and reasonable price; (3) For a situation in which no qualified person responds, the chief procurement officer may determine in writing that there is no time for resolicitation or that resolicitation would likely be futile; provided that when making this determination, consideration shall be given to time constraints, competition in the marketplace, and whether the additional potential cost of preparing, soliciting, and evaluating competitive responses is expected to exceed the benefits normally associated with solicitations. If such a determination is made, the purchasing agency may engage in direct negotiations with a qualified person. For any contract to be awarded, the purchasing agency shall post a "Notice of No Interest Received and Intent to Directly Negotiate" on an internet website accessible to the public for seven days. Any objections shall be submitted in writing and received by the chief procurement officer within seven days from the date the notice was posted. The chief procurement officer shall place the "Notice of No Interest Received and Intent to Directly Negotiate" request on hold, review the objection, and provide a written determination to the person submitting the objection. All documents relating to the objection, including written summary of the disposition of the objection, shall be kept with the procurement file; and (4) The determinations required by this subsection shall be final and conclusive unless the determinations are clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. [(i)] (j) Contracts awarded under this section for $5,000 or more shall be posted electronically within seven days of the contract award by the chief procurement officer or designee and shall remain posted for at least one year. Information to be posted shall include, but not be limited to: (1) The names of the persons submitted under subsection (g); (2) The name of the person or organization receiving the award; (3) The dollar amount of the contract; (4) The name of the head of the purchasing agency or designee making the selection; and (5) Any relationship of the principals to the official making the award. [(j)] (k) Contracts for professional services of less than the limits in section 103D-305, may be negotiated by the head of the purchasing agency, or designee, with at least any two persons on the list of qualified persons established pursuant to subsection (c). Negotiations shall be conducted in the manner set forth in subsection (h), with ranking based on the selection criteria of subsection (e) as determined by the head of the agency. [(k)] (l) In cases of awards made under this section, nonselected professional service providers may submit a written request for debriefing to the chief procurement officer or designee within three working days after the posting of the award of the contract. Thereafter, the head of the purchasing agency shall provide the requester a prompt debriefing in accordance with rules adopted by the policy board. Any protest by the requester pursuant to section 103D-701 following debriefing shall be filed in writing with the chief procurement officer or designee within five working days after the date that the debriefing is completed." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2112. |
|---|
| 47 | + | SECTION 1. The legislature finds that the procurement of professional services pursuant to section 103D-304, Hawaii Revised Statutes, currently requires a selection committee to rank a minimum of three persons based on the selection criteria and send the ranking to the head of the purchasing agency to begin negotiations. This requirement was upheld in Asato v. Procurement Policy Board, 322 P.3d 228 (Haw. S. Ct. 2014). However, when an agency procures professional services and does not receive the requisite number of responses, it must continue to re-solicit. This forces the procuring official to continue expending time and resources to fulfill the solicitation and, if the requisite number of responses is never received, leaves the agency no option to proceed. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to provide a process by which agencies may procure professional services when fewer than three qualified persons respond to an additional solicitation. SECTION 2. Section 103D-304, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: "§103D-304 Procurement of professional services. (a) Professional services shall be procured in accordance with sections 103D-302, 103D-303, 103D-305, 103D-306, or 103D-307, or this section; provided that design professional services furnished by licensees under chapter 464 shall be procured pursuant to this section or section 103D-307. Contracts for professional services shall be awarded on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualification for the type of services required, and at fair and reasonable prices. (b) At a minimum, before the beginning of each fiscal year, the head of each purchasing agency shall publish a notice inviting persons engaged in providing professional services which the agency anticipates needing in the next fiscal year, to submit current statements of qualifications and expressions of interest to the agency. Additional notices shall be given if: (1) The response to the initial notice is inadequate; (2) The response to the initial notice does not result in adequate representation of available sources; (3) New needs for professional services arise; or (4) Rules adopted by the policy board so specify. The chief procurement officer may specify a uniform format for statements of qualifications. Persons may amend these statements by filing a new statement prior to the date designated for submission. (c) The head of the purchasing agency shall designate a review committee consisting of a minimum of three persons with sufficient education, training, and licenses or credentials for each type of professional service which may be required. In designating the members of the review committee, the head of the purchasing agency shall ensure the impartiality and independence of committee members. The names of the members of the review committee established under this section shall be placed in the contract file. The committee shall review and evaluate all submissions and other pertinent information, including references and reports, and prepare a list of qualified persons to provide these services. Persons included on the list of qualified persons may amend their statements of qualifications as necessary or appropriate. Persons shall immediately inform the head of the purchasing agency of any change in information furnished which would disqualify the person from being considered for a contract award. (d) Whenever during the course of the fiscal year the agency needs a particular professional service, the head of the purchasing agency shall designate a selection committee to evaluate the statements of qualification and performance data of those persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) along with any other pertinent information, including references and reports. The selection committee shall be comprised of a minimum of three persons with sufficient education, training, and licenses or credentials in the area of the services required. In designating the members of the selection committee, the head of the purchasing agency shall ensure the impartiality and independence of committee members. The names of the members of a selection committee established under this section shall be placed in the contract file. (e) The selection criteria employed in descending order of importance shall be: (1) Experience and professional qualifications relevant to the project type; (2) Past performance on projects of similar scope for public agencies or private industry, including corrective actions and other responses to notices of deficiencies; (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time; and (4) Any additional criteria determined in writing by the selection committee to be relevant to the purchasing agency's needs or necessary and appropriate to ensure full, open, and fair competition for professional services contracts. (f) The selection committee shall evaluate the submissions of persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) and any other pertinent information which may be available to the agency, against the selection criteria. The committee may conduct confidential discussions with any person who is included on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c) regarding the services which are required and the services they are able to provide. In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from the competing professional service offerors. (g) The selection committee shall rank a minimum of three persons based on the selection criteria and send the ranking to the head of the purchasing agency. The contract file shall contain a copy of the summary of qualifications for the ranking of each of the persons provided to the head of the purchasing agency for contract negotiations. If more than one person holds the same qualifications under this section, the selection committee shall rank the persons in a manner that ensures equal distribution of contracts among the persons holding the same qualifications. The recommendations of the selection committee shall not be overturned without due cause. (h) The head of the purchasing agency or designee shall negotiate a contract with the first ranked person, including a rate of compensation which is fair and reasonable, established in writing, and based upon the estimated value, scope, complexity, and nature of the services to be rendered. If a satisfactory contract cannot be negotiated with the first ranked person, negotiations with that person shall be formally terminated and negotiations with the second ranked person on the list shall commence. The contract file shall include documentation from the head of the purchasing agency, or designee, to support selection of other than the first ranked or next ranked person. Failing accord with the second ranked person, negotiations with the next ranked person on the list shall commence. If a contract at a fair and reasonable price cannot be negotiated, the selection committee may be asked to submit a minimum of three additional persons for the head of the purchasing agency to resume negotiations in the same manner provided in this subsection. Negotiations shall be conducted confidentially. (i) Contracts awarded under this section for $5,000 or more shall be posted electronically within seven days of the contract award by the chief procurement officer or designee and shall remain posted for at least one year. Information to be posted shall include, but not be limited to: (1) The names of the persons submitted under subsection (g); (2) The name of the person or organization receiving the award; (3) The dollar amount of the contract; (4) The name of the head of the purchasing agency or designee making the selection; and (5) Any relationship of the principals to the official making the award. (j) Contracts for professional services of less than the limits in section 103D-305, may be negotiated by the head of the purchasing agency, or designee, with at least any two persons on the list of qualified persons established pursuant to subsection (c). Negotiations shall be conducted in the manner set forth in subsection (h), with ranking based on the selection criteria of subsection (e) as determined by the head of the agency. (k) In cases of awards made under this section, nonselected professional service providers may submit a written request for debriefing to the chief procurement officer or designee within three working days after the posting of the award of the contract. Thereafter, the head of the purchasing agency shall provide the requester a prompt debriefing in accordance with rules adopted by the policy board. Any protest by the requester pursuant to section 103D-701 following debriefing shall be filed in writing with the chief procurement officer or designee within five working days after the date that the debriefing is completed. (l) When fewer than three persons qualified under state law respond to an additional notice of need under subsection (b) that has been posted for at least thirty days, the purchasing agency may request the chief procurement officer's approval to proceed under rules adopted by the policy board. The request shall include the dates of all solicitation notices and the names of all persons on the list prepared pursuant to subsection (c), if any. Submissions shall then be evaluated by the selection committee in accordance with subsections (d), (e), and (f); provided that: (1) If two persons qualified under state law respond to the additional notice, the selection committee shall rank them based on the criteria in subsection (e). If both persons hold the same qualifications, the selection committee shall rank the persons in a manner that ensures equal distribution of contracts between them. The ranking shall be sent to the head of the purchasing agency for negotiations conducted in the manner set forth in subsection (h). The rankings of the selection committee shall not be overturned without due cause; (2) If only one person qualified under state law responds to the additional notice, the selection committee shall first evaluate the person's qualifications and may then send the name to the head of the purchasing agency to negotiate a contract at a fair and reasonable price; and (3) If no response is received to the additional notice, the head of the purchasing agency may determine that there is only one source for the required service and engage in direct negotiations with a qualified person. For any contract to be awarded, the purchasing agency shall issue a "Notice of Sole Source" at least seven days prior to awarding a contract. Persons may file a written objection to the issuance of a contract within seven days. Rules of the policy board shall provide for the disposition of objections, including a written summary of the disposition. The written determination, any objection, past performance evaluations relied upon, and a written summary of the disposition of any objection shall be included in the contract file. The written determination shall contain the information required by the rules of the policy board." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on June 30, 3000. |
|---|