Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB163

Introduced
1/19/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
2/13/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  

Caption

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

Impact

If enacted, HB 163 could significantly impact how repricing requests are evaluated and negotiated in Hawaii's public sector. It intends to provide a structured approach to reviewing pay scales across various public employee classifications, thereby promoting fairness and equity in compensation among employees with similar responsibilities. The bill highlights a need for consistent evaluation criteria to effectively manage employee compensation and comply with anti-discrimination laws.

Summary

House Bill 163 seeks to address the mechanisms surrounding repricing processes for public employees in Hawaii. It mandates the Department of Human Resources Development to conduct a thorough study of the current repricing processes outlined in section 89-9 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. The bill seeks to ensure that the repricing mechanisms are adequate and appropriate, taking into account legal compliance with state and federal laws that mandate equal pay for equal work. A report summarizing findings and recommendations is required to be submitted to the legislature before the start of the 2024 regular session.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 163 appears to be largely supportive among those advocating for fair labor practices and accountability in public employment compensation. Proponents likely appreciate the emphasis on equal pay and the structured review process suggested by the bill. However, there might be apprehensions or concerns from certain stakeholders about the potential bureaucratic implications or additional procedures that could arise from more stringent repricing reviews.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing such studies and the associated administrative burden. Stakeholders could debate whether the proposed time and resources spent on conducting the study will yield significant benefits when weighed against the operational demands of public service, which must still address various ongoing administrative functions.

Companion Bills

HI SB1058

Same As Relating To Collective Bargaining.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance