Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB382

Introduced
1/20/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
2/16/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Engrossed
3/15/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Refer
3/24/23  
Report Pass
4/6/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Enrolled
5/4/23  
Chaptered
6/7/23  

Caption

Relating To The Judiciary.

Impact

The implications of HB 382 on state laws primarily revolve around the financial management of judicial appropriations and funding mechanisms for judicial improvements. The bill ensures that financial allocations are earmarked for specific judiciary needs and that funds will be available for both operational and capital improvement initiatives. Moreover, any unencumbered funds will remain accessible until they can be effectively utilized, addressing potential lapsing issues while providing the judiciary some flexibility in managing funds across different projects.

Summary

House Bill 382, known as the Judiciary Appropriations Act of 2023, aims to provide necessary funding for the judiciary system in Hawaii for the fiscal biennium covering July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2025. The bill proposes appropriating a total of $15,730,000 for various capital improvement projects, which includes significant upgrades and renovations to judicial facilities across the state. Additionally, the bill establishes a framework for financial management and oversight of these appropriations, including provisions for the issuance of general obligation bonds to support the projects outlined within the act.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 382 is generally supportive, particularly among legislators who understand the need for robust funding for judicial facilities. The bill addresses long-standing issues with outdated facilities while enhancing the capability of the judiciary to serve the community more effectively. However, there may be some contention regarding the allocation amounts and the prioritization of specific projects within the appropriations, with some members advocating for more transparency and accountability in how funds are managed and spent.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions surrounding HB 382 include the overall fiscal responsibility associated with bonding authority and the prioritization of certain projects over others. Critics might express concerns about the potential for budget overruns or mismanagement of the appropriated funds, thus underscoring the need for strong oversight mechanisms as the bill moves forward. Ensuring that capital improvement projects are carried out effectively and within budget remains a critical concern for both lawmakers and constituents alike.

Companion Bills

HI SB482

Same As Relating To The Judiciary.

Similar Bills

HI HB1536

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI SB1257

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI HB1911

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI SB2374

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI SB2113

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI SB482

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI SB482

Relating To The Judiciary.

HI SB383

Relating To The Judiciary.