Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB675

Introduced
1/23/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/6/23  
Report Pass
4/28/23  
Report Pass
4/28/23  
Enrolled
5/2/23  
Chaptered
6/21/23  

Caption

Relating To The Hawaii Housing Finance And Development Corporation.

Impact

The enactment of HB 675 will modify Chapter 201H of the Hawaii Revised Statutes by specifying requirements for financing applications related to various affordable housing programs. These programs include the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program, Hula Mae Multi-Family Program, Rental Housing Revolving Fund Program, and Dwelling Unit Revolving Fund Program. By consolidating application periods and processes, the bill aims to improve administrative efficiency and facilitate more consistent approvals for financing housing projects.

Summary

House Bill 675 relates to the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation and aims to enhance the process for financing the development of affordable housing in Hawaii. The bill mandates the corporation to open a minimum of two application periods each year for receiving financing applications from entities interested in developing affordable housing. This initiative is intended to streamline the application process and ensure that funding is allocated efficiently to support housing development efforts across the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 675 appears favorable among legislators and stakeholders who prioritize the need for affordable housing in Hawaii. The bill reflects a legislative commitment to address housing shortages, particularly in light of Hawaii's ongoing challenges with high housing costs. Supporters believe the bill represents positive steps toward enhancing access to affordable housing and streamlining bureaucratic processes.

Contention

While there is substantial support for HB 675, some concerns may center around the adequacy of funding and the effectiveness of the proposed two application periods in meeting housing needs. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the balance between administrative efficiency and the potential for ensuring thorough review processes for applications. Stakeholders may debate the implications of entrenching these financing structures within the state, particularly in relation to how they serve diverse community needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.