By defining the regulations around battery-charged security fences, HB 695 impacts property security and how individuals can protect their non-agricultural property. It would enable property owners to utilize more advanced security solutions while ensuring compliance with safety standards. Additionally, the bill explicitly prohibits counties from enforcing stricter regulations or requiring permits additional to those needed for standard alarm systems, thereby standardizing the regulations across the state.
House Bill 695 seeks to amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes related to the construction and use of battery-charged security fences. The bill classifies battery-charged security fences used for non-agricultural purposes as lawful fences under specific conditions. It stipulates installation standards for such fences, including requiring them to interface with monitored alarm systems, establishing height limits, and mandating visible warnings about the electric charge to ensure safety.
The sentiment around HB 695 is generally supportive among proponents who argue that the measure enhances property security options without overregulation. They emphasize that allowing battery-charged fences addresses concerns over unauthorized entries, thus providing peace of mind for property owners. However, there might be concerns from some community members regarding the safety implications of such fences, particularly around residential areas, which could lead to divided opinions among constituents.
Notable points of contention include the potential for safety risks posed by electric fences, especially if they are installed near residential zones. Opponents of battery-charged security fences express concerns that these structures might lead to accidents or unintended harm to pets and children. Additionally, the restriction on county regulations could be perceived as limiting local governance, where communities might wish to impose their own safety regulations tailored to local needs.