Urging All Branches Of The United States Military Operating In Hawaii To Implement Changes In Their Policies To Reduce, To The Extent Possible, The Use Of Products Containing Perfluoroalkyl And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.
The resolution is particularly significant as it aligns with recent findings from the Hawaii Army National Guard, which confirmed PFAS exceedance levels in groundwater. It calls upon the military to discontinue the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)—a common firefighting agent that contains PFAS—unless in emergency situations and to dispose of PFAS-contaminated materials responsibly, adhering to EPA guidelines. This is a critical measure aimed at safeguarding the drinking water supply of Hawaii residents, especially given the state's unique geographical and environmental considerations.
HCR103 is a House Concurrent Resolution from the Hawaii State Legislature urging all branches of the United States military operating in Hawaii to change their policies regarding the use of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The resolution highlights the dangers associated with these chemicals, which are known to contaminate drinking water and cause a range of adverse health effects, including some types of cancer, fertility issues, and developmental delays in children. The document emphasizes that PFAS, often called 'forever chemicals' due to their persistence in the environment, have been detected in alarming concentrations near military installations.
Sentiment surrounding HCR103 has been largely supportive, reflecting broader public concern about environmental health and safety. Many stakeholders, including health advocates and local communities, view the resolution as a necessary step towards reducing the environmental burden of military operations in Hawaii. However, there may be underlying tensions with military entities that are accustomed to established practices and may find compliance with new regulations challenging. The resolution's call for transparency in past and present PFAS releases also underscores the need for accountability.
The most notable points of contention revolve around the military's reliance on PFAS-containing products in their operations, especially firefighting foam. There are concerns that the resolution might compel significant changes in military protocols and incur costs related to transitioning to PFAS-free alternatives. The military's history of using AFFF has led to significant contamination issues, and while the resolution urges immediate action, the practicality of implementing these changes in a timely manner poses a challenge. The discussion reflects a larger dialogue about environmental responsibility versus operational necessities.