Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HCR194 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.C.R. NO. 194 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 STATE OF HAWAII HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION URGING THE STATE TO PURSUE AN EXEMPTION TO THE COMMERCE CLAUSE of the UNITED STATES constitution FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE GROWN OR RAISED IN THE STATE OF HAWAII.
2	2
3	3	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.C.R. NO. 194
4	4	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8
9	9	H.C.R. NO.
10	10
11	11	194
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29	HOUSE CONCURRENT
30	30
31	31	RESOLUTION
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	URGING THE STATE TO PURSUE AN EXEMPTION TO THE COMMERCE CLAUSE of the UNITED STATES constitution FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE GROWN OR RAISED IN THE STATE OF HAWAII.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	WHEREAS, Hawaii imports more than eighty-five percent of its food and is considered highly vulnerable in issues of food security; and WHEREAS, climate change significantly increases this vulnerability with sea level rise and intensified weather patterns in the Pacific, including unpredictable seas and hurricanes; and WHEREAS, the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, commonly known as the Jones Act, requires that all goods that are shipped within the United States be transported by United States-flagged vessels that are primarily operated by United States citizens; and WHEREAS, much of Hawaii's cargo shipments require marine transportation and are therefore subject to the Jones Act; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the Jones Act create an artificial scarcity of available ships, thus increasing transportation costs; and WHEREAS, in addition to higher shipping costs, local farmers must contend with inflated costs to buy or lease land, and high water rates, as well as one of the highest costs of living in the country; and WHEREAS, these factors make the costs of farming in Hawaii the highest in the nation, creating an almost insurmountable hurdle for local farmers and an unfair advantage for agricultural producers based in the continental United States; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Agriculture defines small farms as those having no more than five hundred acres; and WHEREAS, the latest Hawaii Department of Agriculture surveys reveal that less than four percent of farms in Hawaii surpass that threshold, with the vast majority, ninety-six percent, being very small farms; and WHEREAS, fifty-eight percent of the small farms in Hawaii average sixteen or less acres in size; and WHEREAS, the average small farm in Hawaii incurs losses of almost $10,000 annually due to the high costs of farming; and WHEREAS, the United States Constitution was written in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention, ratified in subsequent state conventions, and took effect in 1789; and WHEREAS, Article I, section 8, clause 3 of the United States Constitution, commonly referred to as the Commerce Clause, gives the United States Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes"; and WHEREAS, historically, courts have interpreted the Commerce Clause to include a prohibition against states passing legislation that discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce by, for example, creating an unfair advantage for their own producers over those of any other state; and WHEREAS, the effects of the Commerce Clause on individual states in the sector of agriculture is currently a highly contested aspect of the law, due to the dominance of a small number of national corporate producers in all states; and WHEREAS, despite this nation's apparent desire for federal laws that prevent discrimination against interstate commerce, the United States Supreme Court has not yet addressed discrimination or undue influence on interstate commerce caused by federal law; and WHEREAS, despite the fact that, on July 9, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden signed Executive Order No. 14036, entitled "Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy," which, among other things, sought to create a fairer, more resilient meat and poultry industry by identifying recurring unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practices, no federal law or executive order has yet addressed the economic disparities experienced by vegetable and fruit growers; and WHEREAS, the intent behind the Commerce Clause was never to favor national corporate agriculture at the expense and survival of small local farms, but rather to ensure robust, diverse market competition; and WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was written, Hawaii was still an independent nation and, hence, Congress did not, nor has it currently, considered the implications of the Commerce Clause on the Hawaiian Islands with regard to current and future food security needs, the extra burden of trans-ocean and intra-state ocean shipping, and economic disparities; and WHEREAS, an exemption from the Commerce Clause would help to restore balance and fair markets to small agricultural producers in the State of Hawaii; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-second Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2023, the Senate concurring, that the Governor, the Legislature of the State of Hawaii, and its representatives in Congress are urged to pursue an exemption to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution for agricultural produce grown in Hawaii; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to all members of Hawaii's congressional delegation, the Governor, the Attorney General, the Chairperson of the Board of Agriculture, and the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. OFFERED BY: _____________________________ Report Title: United States Constitution; Commerce Clause; Exemption; Agricultural Produce
44	44
45	45	WHEREAS, Hawaii imports more than eighty-five percent of its food and is considered highly vulnerable in issues of food security; and
46	46
47	47
48	48
49	49	WHEREAS, climate change significantly increases this vulnerability with sea level rise and intensified weather patterns in the Pacific, including unpredictable seas and hurricanes; and
50	50
51	51
52	52
53	53	WHEREAS, the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, commonly known as the Jones Act, requires that all goods that are shipped within the United States be transported by United States-flagged vessels that are primarily operated by United States citizens; and
54	54
55	55
56	56
57	57	WHEREAS, much of Hawaii's cargo shipments require marine transportation and are therefore subject to the Jones Act; and
58	58
59	59
60	60
61	61	WHEREAS, the requirements of the Jones Act create an artificial scarcity of available ships, thus increasing transportation costs; and
62	62
63	63
64	64
65	65	WHEREAS, in addition to higher shipping costs, local farmers must contend with inflated costs to buy or lease land, and high water rates, as well as one of the highest costs of living in the country; and
66	66
67	67
68	68
69	69	WHEREAS, these factors make the costs of farming in Hawaii the highest in the nation, creating an almost insurmountable hurdle for local farmers and an unfair advantage for agricultural producers based in the continental United States; and
70	70
71	71	WHEREAS, the United States Department of Agriculture defines small farms as those having no more than five hundred acres; and
72	72
73	73
74	74
75	75	WHEREAS, the latest Hawaii Department of Agriculture surveys reveal that less than four percent of farms in Hawaii surpass that threshold, with the vast majority, ninety-six percent, being very small farms; and
76	76
77	77
78	78
79	79	WHEREAS, fifty-eight percent of the small farms in Hawaii average sixteen or less acres in size; and
80	80
81	81
82	82
83	83	WHEREAS, the average small farm in Hawaii incurs losses of almost $10,000 annually due to the high costs of farming; and
84	84
85	85
86	86
87	87	WHEREAS, the United States Constitution was written in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention, ratified in subsequent state conventions, and took effect in 1789; and
88	88
89	89
90	90
91	91	WHEREAS, Article I, section 8, clause 3 of the United States Constitution, commonly referred to as the Commerce Clause, gives the United States Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes"; and
92	92
93	93
94	94
95	95	WHEREAS, historically, courts have interpreted the Commerce Clause to include a prohibition against states passing legislation that discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce by, for example, creating an unfair advantage for their own producers over those of any other state; and
96	96
97	97
98	98
99	99	WHEREAS, the effects of the Commerce Clause on individual states in the sector of agriculture is currently a highly contested aspect of the law, due to the dominance of a small number of national corporate producers in all states; and
100	100
101	101
102	102
103	103	WHEREAS, despite this nation's apparent desire for federal laws that prevent discrimination against interstate commerce, the United States Supreme Court has not yet addressed discrimination or undue influence on interstate commerce caused by federal law; and
104	104
105	105	WHEREAS, despite the fact that, on July 9, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden signed Executive Order No. 14036, entitled "Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy," which, among other things, sought to create a fairer, more resilient meat and poultry industry by identifying recurring unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practices, no federal law or executive order has yet addressed the economic disparities experienced by vegetable and fruit growers; and
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109	WHEREAS, the intent behind the Commerce Clause was never to favor national corporate agriculture at the expense and survival of small local farms, but rather to ensure robust, diverse market competition; and
110	110
111	111
112	112
113	113	WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was written, Hawaii was still an independent nation and, hence, Congress did not, nor has it currently, considered the implications of the Commerce Clause on the Hawaiian Islands with regard to current and future food security needs, the extra burden of trans-ocean and intra-state ocean shipping, and economic disparities; and
114	114
115	115
116	116
117	117	WHEREAS, an exemption from the Commerce Clause would help to restore balance and fair markets to small agricultural producers in the State of Hawaii; now, therefore,
118	118
119	119
120	120
121	121	BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-second Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2023, the Senate concurring, that the Governor, the Legislature of the State of Hawaii, and its representatives in Congress are urged to pursue an exemption to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution for agricultural produce grown in Hawaii; and
122	122
123	123	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to all members of Hawaii's congressional delegation, the Governor, the Attorney General, the Chairperson of the Board of Agriculture, and the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.
124	124
125	125
126	126
127	127
128	128
129	129
130	130
131	131	OFFERED BY: _____________________________
132	132
133	133
134	134
135	135	OFFERED BY:
136	136
137	137	_____________________________
138	138
139	139
140	140
141	141
142	142
143	143	Report Title:
144	144
145	145	United States Constitution; Commerce Clause; Exemption; Agricultural Produce