Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HR204 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. NO. 204 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 STATE OF HAWAII HOUSE RESOLUTION urging the president of the united states to publish the equal rights amendment as the twenty-eighth amendment to the constitution of the united states of America.
2	2
3	3	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. NO. 204
4	4	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8
9	9	H.R. NO.
10	10
11	11	204
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29	HOUSE RESOLUTION
30	30
31	31
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35	urging the president of the united states to publish the equal rights amendment as the twenty-eighth amendment to the constitution of the united states of America.
36	36
37	37
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	WHEREAS, in 1972, the ninety-second Congress of the United States, at its second session, in both houses, by a constitutional majority of two-thirds, adopted the following proposition to amend the Constitution of the United States of America: "JOINT RESOLUTION RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED (TWO-THIRDS OF EACH HOUSE CONCURRING THEREIN), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as a part of the Constitution when ratified by legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress: "ARTICLE Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.""; and WHEREAS, Article V of the Constitution of the United States sets forth a two-step amending procedure; and WHEREAS, the first step of the Article V amending procedure is proposal of an amendment either by two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress or by a convention called by application of two-thirds of the states; and WHEREAS, the second and final step of the Article V amending procedure is ratification of an amendment by three-fourths of the states; and WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States does not limit the time for states to ratify an amendment; and WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States does not grant Congress the unilateral authority to limit the time for states to ratify amendments; and WHEREAS, a time limit on state ratification of amendments is a substantive change to the Constitution of the United States; and WHEREAS, to have full force and effect, any substantive change to the Constitution of the United States, such as a time limit on ratification, must be within the text of an amendment, where it can also be approved by states as part of each of the two steps of the Article V amending procedure a proposal step and a ratification step; and WHEREAS, in the proposal step for the Equal Rights Amendment, the time limit on state ratification was only in the preamble section of the resolution by Congress and not within the text of the amendment presented to the states for state approval; and WHEREAS, in the ratification step, the states ratified only the text of the Equal Rights Amendment; and WHEREAS, a time limit was only approved by Congress in 1972, but not subsequently approved by the states and is thus without force or effect; and WHEREAS, in comparison, when in 1978 two-thirds of both houses of Congress passed the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, a timeline was included within the text of the amendment offered to states for ratification; and WHEREAS, the time limit for the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment ended before completion of the second and final step of ratification of the amendment by three-fourths of the states; and WHEREAS, because the time limit was within the text of the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, that time limit had full force and effect and the amendment expired in 1985; and WHEREAS, in comparison, the text of the Twenty-first and Twenty-second Amendments both include a timeline within the text of each amendment, and such timelines were ratified by three-fourths of the states within the agreed timeline; and WHEREAS, in 1789, by two-thirds vote of each house of the first United States Congress, the so-called Madison Amendment relating to compensation of members of Congress completed the proposal step of Article V; and WHEREAS, approximately two hundred three years later the Madison Amendment completed the ratification step of Article V through ratification by three-fourths of the states; and WHEREAS, in 1992, having met the strict two-step requirements of Article V, the Madison Amendment was published by the Archivist of the United States during President George H.W. Bush's administration as the Twenty-seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and WHEREAS, following publication of the Madison Amendment, Congress affirmed the Madison Amendment as the Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; and WHEREAS, as of January 27, 2020, three-fourths of the states have ratified the Equal Rights Amendment; and WHEREAS, unlike the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, the Equal Rights Amendment does not have a time limit in its text where it would be of full force and effect; and WHEREAS, in contrast to the Madison Amendment, which took two hundred three years to ratify, the Equal Rights Amendment took a mere forty-eight years to ratify; and WHEREAS, the text of Article V of the Constitution of the United States gives the states the power of ratification, not recission; and WHEREAS, Samuel Johnson's dictionary of 1755 defines "ratify" as "to confirm; to settle"; and WHEREAS, Bouvier's Law Dictionary of 1856, considered to be the first American legal dictionary, states that a ratification once done "cannot be revoked or recalled"; and WHEREAS, James Madison wrote in a July 20, 1788, letter to Alexander Hamilton that ratification is "in toto and for ever"; and WHEREAS, the various attempts throughout history to rescind the ratifications of the Constitution of the United States or its amendments, including the Fourteenth, Fifteenth, and Nineteenth Amendments, have never been honored; and WHEREAS, the Equal Rights Amendment now meets the strict requirements of Article V of the Constitution of the United States and should be added as the Twenty-eighth Amendment; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-second Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2023, that this body urges the administration of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to publish without delay the Equal Rights Amendment as the Twenty-eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this body urges the Congress of the United States to pass a joint resolution affirming the Equal Rights Amendment as the Twenty-eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this body calls on other states to join this action by passing the same or similar resolutions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this Resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, Vice President of the United States, each member of Hawaii's congressional delegation, and Archivist of the United States. OFFERED BY: _____________________________ Report Title: Equal Rights Amendment
44	44
45	45	WHEREAS, in 1972, the ninety-second Congress of the United States, at its second session, in both houses, by a constitutional majority of two-thirds, adopted the following proposition to amend the Constitution of the United States of America:
46	46
47	47
48	48
49	49	"JOINT RESOLUTION RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED (TWO-THIRDS OF EACH HOUSE CONCURRING THEREIN), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as a part of the Constitution when ratified by legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:
50	50
51	51
52	52
53	53	"ARTICLE
54	54
55	55
56	56
57	57	Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
58	58
59	59
60	60
61	61	Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
62	62
63	63
64	64
65	65	Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.""; and
66	66
67	67
68	68
69	69	WHEREAS, Article V of the Constitution of the United States sets forth a two-step amending procedure; and
70	70
71	71
72	72
73	73	WHEREAS, the first step of the Article V amending procedure is proposal of an amendment either by two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress or by a convention called by application of two-thirds of the states; and
74	74
75	75
76	76
77	77	WHEREAS, the second and final step of the Article V amending procedure is ratification of an amendment by three-fourths of the states; and
78	78
79	79
80	80
81	81	WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States does not limit the time for states to ratify an amendment; and
82	82
83	83
84	84
85	85	WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States does not grant Congress the unilateral authority to limit the time for states to ratify amendments; and
86	86
87	87
88	88
89	89	WHEREAS, a time limit on state ratification of amendments is a substantive change to the Constitution of the United States; and
90	90
91	91
92	92
93	93	WHEREAS, to have full force and effect, any substantive change to the Constitution of the United States, such as a time limit on ratification, must be within the text of an amendment, where it can also be approved by states as part of each of the two steps of the Article V amending procedure a proposal step and a ratification step; and
94	94
95	95
96	96
97	97	WHEREAS, in the proposal step for the Equal Rights Amendment, the time limit on state ratification was only in the preamble section of the resolution by Congress and not within the text of the amendment presented to the states for state approval; and
98	98
99	99
100	100
101	101	WHEREAS, in the ratification step, the states ratified only the text of the Equal Rights Amendment; and
102	102
103	103
104	104
105	105	WHEREAS, a time limit was only approved by Congress in 1972, but not subsequently approved by the states and is thus without force or effect; and
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109	WHEREAS, in comparison, when in 1978 two-thirds of both houses of Congress passed the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, a timeline was included within the text of the amendment offered to states for ratification; and
110	110
111	111
112	112
113	113	WHEREAS, the time limit for the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment ended before completion of the second and final step of ratification of the amendment by three-fourths of the states; and
114	114
115	115
116	116
117	117	WHEREAS, because the time limit was within the text of the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, that time limit had full force and effect and the amendment expired in 1985; and
118	118
119	119
120	120
121	121	WHEREAS, in comparison, the text of the Twenty-first and Twenty-second Amendments both include a timeline within the text of each amendment, and such timelines were ratified by three-fourths of the states within the agreed timeline; and
122	122
123	123
124	124
125	125	WHEREAS, in 1789, by two-thirds vote of each house of the first United States Congress, the so-called Madison Amendment relating to compensation of members of Congress completed the proposal step of Article V; and
126	126
127	127
128	128
129	129	WHEREAS, approximately two hundred three years later the Madison Amendment completed the ratification step of Article V through ratification by three-fourths of the states; and
130	130
131	131
132	132
133	133	WHEREAS, in 1992, having met the strict two-step requirements of Article V, the Madison Amendment was published by the Archivist of the United States during President George H.W. Bush's administration as the Twenty-seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
134	134
135	135
136	136
137	137	WHEREAS, following publication of the Madison Amendment, Congress affirmed the Madison Amendment as the Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; and
138	138
139	139
140	140
141	141	WHEREAS, as of January 27, 2020, three-fourths of the states have ratified the Equal Rights Amendment; and
142	142
143	143
144	144
145	145	WHEREAS, unlike the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, the Equal Rights Amendment does not have a time limit in its text where it would be of full force and effect; and
146	146
147	147
148	148
149	149	WHEREAS, in contrast to the Madison Amendment, which took two hundred three years to ratify, the Equal Rights Amendment took a mere forty-eight years to ratify; and
150	150
151	151
152	152
153	153	WHEREAS, the text of Article V of the Constitution of the United States gives the states the power of ratification, not recission; and
154	154
155	155
156	156
157	157	WHEREAS, Samuel Johnson's dictionary of 1755 defines "ratify" as "to confirm; to settle"; and
158	158
159	159
160	160
161	161	WHEREAS, Bouvier's Law Dictionary of 1856, considered to be the first American legal dictionary, states that a ratification once done "cannot be revoked or recalled"; and
162	162
163	163
164	164
165	165	WHEREAS, James Madison wrote in a July 20, 1788, letter to Alexander Hamilton that ratification is "in toto and for ever"; and
166	166
167	167
168	168
169	169	WHEREAS, the various attempts throughout history to rescind the ratifications of the Constitution of the United States or its amendments, including the Fourteenth, Fifteenth, and Nineteenth Amendments, have never been honored; and
170	170
171	171
172	172
173	173	WHEREAS, the Equal Rights Amendment now meets the strict requirements of Article V of the Constitution of the United States and should be added as the Twenty-eighth Amendment; now, therefore,
174	174
175	175
176	176
177	177	BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-second Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2023, that this body urges the administration of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to publish without delay the Equal Rights Amendment as the Twenty-eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
178	178
179	179
180	180
181	181	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this body urges the Congress of the United States to pass a joint resolution affirming the Equal Rights Amendment as the Twenty-eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
182	182
183	183
184	184
185	185	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this body calls on other states to join this action by passing the same or similar resolutions; and
186	186
187	187
188	188
189	189	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this Resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, Vice President of the United States, each member of Hawaii's congressional delegation, and Archivist of the United States.
190	190
191	191
192	192
193	193
194	194
195	195
196	196
197	197	OFFERED BY: _____________________________
198	198
199	199
200	200
201	201	OFFERED BY:
202	202
203	203	_____________________________
204	204
205	205
206	206
207	207
208	208
209	209	Report Title:
210	210
211	211	Equal Rights Amendment