Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB29 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 29 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO CUSTODY AND VISITATION. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 29
4	4	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	THE SENATE
8	8
9	9	S.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	29
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	RELATING TO CUSTODY AND VISITATION.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that individuals who abuse their intimate partners have been known to misuse court proceedings to control, harass, intimidate, coerce, or impoverish the abused partner. This litigation abuse occurs in a variety of contexts. In the family court, abusers have used cases involving dissolution, legal separation, parenting plan action or modification, a protection order, or child custody to harm or exploit their partner and children's well-being. Abusers have also filed meritless civil lawsuits alleging breach of contract, defamation, or another tort to force the abused partners to spend time, money, and emotional resources responding to the lawsuits. Due to the lengthy nature of legal proceedings, litigation abuse can extend long after a relationship has ended. The legislature also finds that courts should be aware that perpetrators use coercive control to harm and exploit their partner and children's well-being when child custody is under consideration. When courts are evaluating the best and safest way to issue custody orders, analysis should include acts of coercive control. The purpose of this Act is to add coercive control and litigation abuse by a parent of a child to the list of factors the court shall consider in determining what constitutes the child's best interest when awarding custody and visitation rights to individuals in actions for divorce, separation, annulment, separate maintenance, or any other proceeding where the custody of a minor child is under dispute. SECTION 2. Section 571-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) In determining what constitutes the best interest of the child under this section, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Any history of sexual or physical abuse of a child by a parent; (2) Any history of neglect or emotional abuse of a child by a parent; (3) The overall quality of the parent-child relationship; (4) The history of caregiving or parenting by each parent prior and subsequent to a marital or other type of separation; (5) Each parent's cooperation in developing and implementing a plan to meet the child's ongoing needs, interests, and schedule; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent; (6) The physical health needs of the child; (7) The emotional needs of the child; (8) The safety needs of the child; (9) The educational needs of the child; (10) The child's need for relationships with siblings; (11) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they allow the child to maintain family connections through family events and activities; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent; (12) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they separate the child's needs from the parent's needs; (13) Any evidence of past or current drug or alcohol abuse by a parent; (14) The mental health of each parent; (15) The areas and levels of conflict present within the family; [and] (16) A parent's prior wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process under chapter 586 to gain a tactical advantage in any proceeding involving the custody determination of a minor. [Such] The wilful misuse may be considered only if it is established by clear and convincing evidence, and if it is further found by clear and convincing evidence that in the particular family circumstance the wilful misuse tends to show that, in the future, the parent who engaged in the wilful misuse will not be able to cooperate successfully with the other parent in their shared responsibilities for the child. The court shall articulate findings of fact whenever relying upon this factor as part of its determination of the best interests of the child. For the purposes of this section, when taken alone, the voluntary dismissal of a petition for protection from abuse shall not be treated as prima facie evidence that a wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process has occurred[.]; (17) Any history of coercive control of the child or a parent of the child by the other parent; and (18) Any history of litigation abuse by a parent of the child against the other parent. As used in this subsection: "Coercive control" shall have the same meaning as defined in section 586‑1. "Litigation abuse" means: (1) (A) The opposing parties have a current or former intimate partner relationship; (B) The party who is filing, initiating, advancing, or continuing the litigation: (i) Is a restrained party under a temporary restraining order; (ii) Has been arrested for violation of chapter 586 or 709; or (iii) Has been the subject of an investigation by the child welfare services branch of the department of human services; and (C) The litigation is being initiated, advanced, or continued primarily for the purpose of harassing, intimidating, or maintaining contact with the other party; and (2) At least one of the following factors is present: (A) Claims, allegations, and other legal contentions made in the litigation are not warranted by existing law or by a reasonable argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or the establishment of new law; (B) Allegations and other factual contentions made in the litigation are without evidentiary support; or (C) The issue or issues that are the basis of the litigation have previously been contested in one or more courts, and the actions have been litigated and disposed of unfavorably to the party filing, initiating, advancing, or continuing the litigation." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that individuals who abuse their intimate partners have been known to misuse court proceedings to control, harass, intimidate, coerce, or impoverish the abused partner. This litigation abuse occurs in a variety of contexts. In the family court, abusers have used cases involving dissolution, legal separation, parenting plan action or modification, a protection order, or child custody to harm or exploit their partner and children's well-being. Abusers have also filed meritless civil lawsuits alleging breach of contract, defamation, or another tort to force the abused partners to spend time, money, and emotional resources responding to the lawsuits. Due to the lengthy nature of legal proceedings, litigation abuse can extend long after a relationship has ended.
50	50
51	51	The legislature also finds that courts should be aware that perpetrators use coercive control to harm and exploit their partner and children's well-being when child custody is under consideration. When courts are evaluating the best and safest way to issue custody orders, analysis should include acts of coercive control.
52	52
53	53	The purpose of this Act is to add coercive control and litigation abuse by a parent of a child to the list of factors the court shall consider in determining what constitutes the child's best interest when awarding custody and visitation rights to individuals in actions for divorce, separation, annulment, separate maintenance, or any other proceeding where the custody of a minor child is under dispute.
54	54
55	55	SECTION 2. Section 571-46, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
56	56
57	57	"(b) In determining what constitutes the best interest of the child under this section, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following:
58	58
59	59	(1) Any history of sexual or physical abuse of a child by a parent;
60	60
61	61	(2) Any history of neglect or emotional abuse of a child by a parent;
62	62
63	63	(3) The overall quality of the parent-child relationship;
64	64
65	65	(4) The history of caregiving or parenting by each parent prior and subsequent to a marital or other type of separation;
66	66
67	67	(5) Each parent's cooperation in developing and implementing a plan to meet the child's ongoing needs, interests, and schedule; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent;
68	68
69	69	(6) The physical health needs of the child;
70	70
71	71	(7) The emotional needs of the child;
72	72
73	73	(8) The safety needs of the child;
74	74
75	75	(9) The educational needs of the child;
76	76
77	77	(10) The child's need for relationships with siblings;
78	78
79	79	(11) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they allow the child to maintain family connections through family events and activities; provided that this factor shall not be considered in any case where the court has determined that family violence has been committed by a parent;
80	80
81	81	(12) Each parent's actions demonstrating that they separate the child's needs from the parent's needs;
82	82
83	83	(13) Any evidence of past or current drug or alcohol abuse by a parent;
84	84
85	85	(14) The mental health of each parent;
86	86
87	87	(15) The areas and levels of conflict present within the family; [and]
88	88
89	89	(16) A parent's prior wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process under chapter 586 to gain a tactical advantage in any proceeding involving the custody determination of a minor. [Such] The wilful misuse may be considered only if it is established by clear and convincing evidence, and if it is further found by clear and convincing evidence that in the particular family circumstance the wilful misuse tends to show that, in the future, the parent who engaged in the wilful misuse will not be able to cooperate successfully with the other parent in their shared responsibilities for the child. The court shall articulate findings of fact whenever relying upon this factor as part of its determination of the best interests of the child. For the purposes of this section, when taken alone, the voluntary dismissal of a petition for protection from abuse shall not be treated as prima facie evidence that a wilful misuse of the protection from abuse process has occurred[.];
90	90
91	91	(17) Any history of coercive control of the child or a parent of the child by the other parent; and
92	92
93	93	(18) Any history of litigation abuse by a parent of the child against the other parent.
94	94
95	95	As used in this subsection:
96	96
97	97	"Coercive control" shall have the same meaning as defined in section 586‑1.
98	98
99	99	"Litigation abuse" means:
100	100
101	101	(1) (A) The opposing parties have a current or former intimate partner relationship;
102	102
103	103	(B) The party who is filing, initiating, advancing, or continuing the litigation:
104	104
105	105	(i) Is a restrained party under a temporary restraining order;
106	106
107	107	(ii) Has been arrested for violation of chapter 586 or 709; or
108	108
109	109	(iii) Has been the subject of an investigation by the child welfare services branch of the department of human services; and
110	110
111	111	(C) The litigation is being initiated, advanced, or continued primarily for the purpose of harassing, intimidating, or maintaining contact with the other party; and
112	112
113	113	(2) At least one of the following factors is present:
114	114
115	115	(A) Claims, allegations, and other legal contentions made in the litigation are not warranted by existing law or by a reasonable argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or the establishment of new law;
116	116
117	117	(B) Allegations and other factual contentions made in the litigation are without evidentiary support; or
118	118
119	119	(C) The issue or issues that are the basis of the litigation have previously been contested in one or more courts, and the actions have been litigated and disposed of unfavorably to the party filing, initiating, advancing, or continuing the litigation."
120	120
121	121	SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
122	122
123	123	SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
124	124
125	125	SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
126	126
127	127
128	128
129	129	INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
130	130
131	131	INTRODUCED BY:
132	132
133	133	_____________________________
134	134
135	135
136	136
137	137
138	138
139	139	Report Title: Judiciary; Domestic Abuse; Coercive Control; Litigation Abuse; Custody and Visitation Rights Description: Adds coercive control and litigation abuse by a parent of a child to the list of factors the court shall consider in determining what constitutes the child's best interest when awarding custody and visitation rights to individuals. Defines "coercive control" and "litigation abuse". The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
140	140
141	141
142	142
143	143
144	144
145	145	Report Title:
146	146
147	147	Judiciary; Domestic Abuse; Coercive Control; Litigation Abuse; Custody and Visitation Rights
148	148
149	149
150	150
151	151	Description:
152	152
153	153	Adds coercive control and litigation abuse by a parent of a child to the list of factors the court shall consider in determining what constitutes the child's best interest when awarding custody and visitation rights to individuals. Defines "coercive control" and "litigation abuse".
154	154
155	155
156	156
157	157
158	158
159	159
160	160
161	161	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.