Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB637

Introduced
1/20/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
4/3/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  

Caption

Relating To Hemp.

Impact

The revised regulations could lead to revitalization in Hawaii's nascent hemp industry by clarifying processing rights for licensed farmers. By allowing processing to occur in structures that meet the criteria set forth in section 46-88 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, the bill aims to facilitate easier access to hemp processing for local producers. This could empower farmers to better utilize their crops and remain competitive, potentially reclaiming portions of the estimated $32 million to $54 million market currently benefiting out-of-state entities.

Summary

Senate Bill 637 aims to amend the existing hemp processing rules in Hawaii, allowing licensed hemp farmers to process hemp in agricultural structures and buildings that qualify as permit-exempt under state law. The bill addresses previous regulations that unintentionally restricted farmers from processing hemp on their farms, thus hampering their ability to compete in a national market. This change suggests a recognition of the crop's potential to contribute significantly to Hawaii's agricultural economy—highlighting the importance of diversifying revenue streams for farmers amidst challenges posed by overregulation and market competition.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 637 appears supportive among agricultural advocates and farmers who rely on hemp as a viable crop. Many stakeholders argue that the bill is crucial for stabilizing farm revenues by permitting hemp processing in familiar structures without necessitating complex building permits. However, the conversation may also reflect underlying concerns regarding overregulation that has historically influenced the agricultural landscape in Hawaii, suggesting cautious optimism among proponents of the bill.

Contention

While there appears to be solid backing for the bill from the agricultural sector, opponents may express concerns regarding the implementation and oversight of processing activities to ensure safety and compliance with broader regulatory frameworks. Some legislators may worry that relaxing regulations could inadvertently introduce risks, impacting product safety and quality. Nevertheless, the bill seeks to balance the need for regulation with the practicalities of farming operations, aiming to create a framework that supports local farmers while maintaining essential safety standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI SB2521

Relating To Agricultural Buildings.

HI SB3240

Relating To Agricultural Buildings And Structures.

HI HB1726

Relating To Agricultural Buildings.

HI SB3196

Relating To Agricultural Buildings.

CA AB2452

Structural Fumigation Enforcement Program.

HI SB637

Relating To Hemp.

HI HB96

Relating To Agricultural Buildings.

ME LD1739

An Act to Authorize a General Fund Bond Issue to Support Maine's Agricultural Sector, to Create an Agricultural Buildings Property Tax Exemption and to Direct the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to Study Barriers to Its Financial Assistance Programs and Study the Potential for a Common Application for Those Programs