Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB933 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-THE SENATE S.B. NO. 933 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 S.D. 1 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
1+THE SENATE S.B. NO. 933 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to temporary restraining orders. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
22
33 THE SENATE S.B. NO. 933
4-THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 S.D. 1
4+THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
55 STATE OF HAWAII
66
77 THE SENATE
88
99 S.B. NO.
1010
1111 933
1212
1313 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
1414
15-S.D. 1
15+
1616
1717 STATE OF HAWAII
1818
1919
2020
2121
2222
2323
2424
2525
2626
2727
2828
2929
3030
3131 A BILL FOR AN ACT
3232
3333
3434
3535
3636
3737 relating to temporary restraining orders.
3838
3939
4040
4141
4242
4343 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
4444
4545
4646
47- SECTION 1. The legislature finds that, since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been an increase in gender-based violence against women in Hawaii, particularly through intimate partner violence. Further, the Domestic Violence Action Center's Helpline reported a forty-six per cent increase in calls to report cases of domestic and intimate partner violence from late March to early October 2022. The legislature notes that, though temporary restraining order (TRO) petitions are initially acted upon by a family court judge without a court hearing, a mandatory hearing is held within fifteen days of a TRO being granted in order to determine whether the TRO should remain in effect. The legislature further finds that the adversarial nature of the legal system requires petitioners who have received TROs to face their alleged abusers in court during these hearings. The legislature also finds that, notwithstanding the safety protocols that the judiciary takes to protect parties during in person TRO hearings, the physical presence of the parties within the same room may allow for respondents to intimidate petitioners through words or body language. Further, a 2020 study by the University of Arizona found that eighty-one per cent of legal advocates indicated that many, most, or all of their clients identified the behaviors of the alleged abuser or abusers' associates in court as a source of re-traumatization. The legislature also notes that survivors of domestic and intimate partner violence often lack access to transportation, child care, and paid time off, which can make mandatory in person hearings especially burdensome for petitioners. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic abuse is alleged. SECTION 2. Section 586-5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) On the earliest date that the business of the court will permit, but no later than fifteen days from the date the temporary restraining order is granted, the court, after giving due notice to all parties, shall hold a hearing on the application requiring cause to be shown why the order should not continue. In the event that service has not been effected, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. All parties shall [be present at] attend the hearing and may be represented by counsel. The court shall allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely if the petitioner's allegations include at least one allegation of domestic abuse as defined in section 586-1. The protective order may include all orders stated in the temporary restraining order and may provide further relief, as the court deems necessary to prevent domestic abuse or a recurrence of abuse, including orders establishing temporary visitation with regard to minor children of the parties and orders to either or both parties to participate in domestic violence intervention." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
47+ SECTION 1. The legislature finds that, since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been an increase in gender-based violence against women in Hawaii, particularly through intimate partner violence. Further, the Domestic Violence Action Center's Helpline reported a forty-six per cent increase in calls to report cases of domestic and intimate partner violence from late March to early October 2022. The legislature notes that, though temporary restraining order (TRO) petitions are initially acted upon by a family court judge without a court hearing, a mandatory hearing is held within fifteen days of a TRO being granted in order to determine whether the TRO should remain in effect. The legislature further finds that the adversarial nature of the legal system requires petitioners who have received TROs to face their alleged abusers in court during these hearings. The legislature also finds that, notwithstanding the safety protocols that the judiciary takes to protect parties during in person TRO hearings, the physical presence of the parties within the same room may allow for respondents to intimidate petitioners through words or body language. Further, a 2020 study by the University of Arizona found that eighty-one per cent of legal advocates indicated that many, most, or all of their clients identified the behaviors of the alleged abuser or abusers' associates in court as a source of re-traumatization. The legislature also notes that survivors of domestic and intimate partner violence often lack access to transportation, child care, and paid time off, which can make mandatory in person hearings especially burdensome for petitioners. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic violence or intimate partner violence is alleged or the petitioner has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. SECTION 2. Section 586-5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) On the earliest date that the business of the court will permit, but [no] not later than fifteen days from the date the temporary restraining order is granted, the court, after giving due notice to all parties, shall hold a hearing on the application requiring cause to be shown why the order should not continue. In the event that service has not been effected, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. All parties shall [be present at] attend the hearing and may be represented by counsel. The court shall allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely if the petitioner's allegations include at least one allegation of domestic violence or intimate partner violence or if the petitioner has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. The protective order may include all orders stated in the temporary restraining order and may provide further relief, as the court deems necessary to prevent domestic abuse or a recurrence of abuse, including orders establishing temporary visitation with regard to minor children of the parties and orders to either or both parties to participate in domestic violence intervention." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
4848
4949 SECTION 1. The legislature finds that, since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been an increase in gender-based violence against women in Hawaii, particularly through intimate partner violence. Further, the Domestic Violence Action Center's Helpline reported a forty-six per cent increase in calls to report cases of domestic and intimate partner violence from late March to early October 2022. The legislature notes that, though temporary restraining order (TRO) petitions are initially acted upon by a family court judge without a court hearing, a mandatory hearing is held within fifteen days of a TRO being granted in order to determine whether the TRO should remain in effect.
5050
5151 The legislature further finds that the adversarial nature of the legal system requires petitioners who have received TROs to face their alleged abusers in court during these hearings. The legislature also finds that, notwithstanding the safety protocols that the judiciary takes to protect parties during in person TRO hearings, the physical presence of the parties within the same room may allow for respondents to intimidate petitioners through words or body language. Further, a 2020 study by the University of Arizona found that eighty-one per cent of legal advocates indicated that many, most, or all of their clients identified the behaviors of the alleged abuser or abusers' associates in court as a source of re-traumatization. The legislature also notes that survivors of domestic and intimate partner violence often lack access to transportation, child care, and paid time off, which can make mandatory in person hearings especially burdensome for petitioners.
5252
53- Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic abuse is alleged.
53+ Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic violence or intimate partner violence is alleged or the petitioner has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
5454
5555 SECTION 2. Section 586-5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
5656
57- "(b) On the earliest date that the business of the court will permit, but no later than fifteen days from the date the temporary restraining order is granted, the court, after giving due notice to all parties, shall hold a hearing on the application requiring cause to be shown why the order should not continue. In the event that service has not been effected, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. All parties shall [be present at] attend the hearing and may be represented by counsel. The court shall allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely if the petitioner's allegations include at least one allegation of domestic abuse as defined in section 586-1.
57+ "(b) On the earliest date that the business of the court will permit, but [no] not later than fifteen days from the date the temporary restraining order is granted, the court, after giving due notice to all parties, shall hold a hearing on the application requiring cause to be shown why the order should not continue. In the event that service has not been effected, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. All parties shall [be present at] attend the hearing and may be represented by counsel. The court shall allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely if the petitioner's allegations include at least one allegation of domestic violence or intimate partner violence or if the petitioner has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
5858
5959 The protective order may include all orders stated in the temporary restraining order and may provide further relief, as the court deems necessary to prevent domestic abuse or a recurrence of abuse, including orders establishing temporary visitation with regard to minor children of the parties and orders to either or both parties to participate in domestic violence intervention."
6060
6161 SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
6262
6363 SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
6464
65- Report Title: Temporary Restraining Orders; Domestic Abuse; Partner Violence; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; Remote Attendance Description: Allows petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic abuse is alleged. (SD1) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
65+
66+
67+INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
68+
69+INTRODUCED BY:
70+
71+_____________________________
72+
73+
74+
75+
76+
77+ Report Title: Temporary Restraining Orders; Domestic Violence; Partner Violence; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; Remote Attendance Description: Allows petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic violence or intimate partner violence is alleged or the petitioner has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
6678
6779
6880
6981
7082
7183 Report Title:
7284
73-Temporary Restraining Orders; Domestic Abuse; Partner Violence; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; Remote Attendance
85+Temporary Restraining Orders; Domestic Violence; Partner Violence; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; Remote Attendance
7486
7587
7688
7789 Description:
7890
79-Allows petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic abuse is alleged. (SD1)
91+Allows petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely when domestic violence or intimate partner violence is alleged or the petitioner has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
8092
8193
8294
8395
8496
8597
8698
8799 The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.