Urging The Department Of Health To Take Certain Actions Regarding Fugitive Dust.
If adopted, SCR217 would prompt the Department of Health to revise its administrative rules under Chapter 91 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. This would include creating defined precautions for landowners to prevent dust emissions and requiring the development and submission of fugitive dust mitigation plans for vacant, undeveloped lands. Additionally, it calls for the establishment of penalties for non-compliance, thereby holding landowners accountable for dust control. These measures are expected to bolster the protection of the environment and public health.
SCR217 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution from the State of Hawaii that urges the Department of Health to take specific actions regarding fugitive dust emissions from vacant agricultural lands. It highlights the impacts of dust storms that arise from these lands, including the loss of precious topsoil into the ocean, which subsequently damages marine ecosystems and affects the health of nearby residents. The resolution addresses the need for enhanced regulations targeting the management of dust emissions, particularly from undeveloped lands, to reduce their hazardous effects.
The resolution also calls for ongoing monitoring of fugitive dust across the state and mandates a report from the Department of Health detailing progress and recommendations to be submitted prior to the next legislative session in 2024. This consistent oversight aims to ensure that the measures implemented are effective and that adjustments can be made in response to any emerging challenges related to fugitive dust management.
There are potential points of contention with the implementation of SCR217. Landowners may express concerns about the regulatory burdens imposed, particularly regarding the costs and logistics of creating and submitting mitigation plans. Moreover, discussions could arise around the balance of regulatory authority and property rights. While proponents argue that strict measures are necessary for environmental protection and community health, opponents may contend that excessive regulation could hinder land development and economic opportunities.