Urging The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency To Include In All Live And Recorded Emergency Alert System Video Broadcasts, An On-screen Interpreter Disseminating The Emergency Information In American Sign Language At All Times, Including During Graphic Presentations.
The adoption of SCR44 could significantly alter the approach to emergency communications in Hawaii. By mandating ASL interpretation in EAS broadcasts, the resolution aims to create a more inclusive communication strategy that safeguards lives and property across the state during emergencies. This change not only demonstrates a commitment to accessibility but also sets a precedent for similar measures in different jurisdictions, enhancing the protection of individuals with hearing impairments during crises.
SCR44, a Senate Concurrent Resolution introduced in the Hawai'i legislature, urges the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency (HI-EMA) to enhance accessibility during emergency alerts. Specifically, the resolution advocates for the inclusion of an on-screen interpreter providing American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation during all live and recorded Emergency Alert System (EAS) broadcasts. This initiative arose from gaps identified in past emergency responses, notably the recent volcanic eruptions, where the absence of ASL interpretation deprived deaf and hard of hearing individuals of crucial safety information. The resolution reflects an imperative to ensure that emergency communications are accessible to all residents, particularly vulnerable populations.
Overall sentiment surrounding SCR44 appears to be positive, with strong support from advocates for the deaf and hard of hearing community. Legislators recognize the need for improved communication strategies that cater to diverse audiences during emergencies. However, discussions may arise regarding implementation logistics and resource allocation, highlighting the challenge of balancing accessibility with operational capabilities during critical times. The proactive nature of this resolution indicates a progressive shift towards inclusivity in state emergency management practices.
Notable points of contention could emerge around resource allocation for training ASL interpreters and the technical aspects of integrating ASL interpretation consistently in broadcasts. Questions regarding the funding for these measures, as well as the feasibility of maintaining a dedicated ASL interpreter camera during various types of emergency broadcasts, may spark debate among stakeholders. Nevertheless, the core message of SCR44 emphasizes the necessity of prioritizing accessibility, pushing against historical neglect of this issue within emergency management frameworks.