Hawaii Senate Bill SR162

Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Report Pass: 4/4/23
• Passed: 4/5/23

Caption

Requesting The Auditor To Conduct A Comprehensive Management Audit Of The Division Of Boating And Ocean Recreation Of The Department Of Land And Natural Resources.

Impact

The proposed audit aims to address prevalent issues related to the operational management of state-run boating facilities. Since the last audit in 2001, there have been continuous concerns regarding the inadequacies in planning, fee structures, and financial controls. The resolution stipulates specific assessments to examine whether current operations meet their intended goals and to ensure that collected taxes and fees are used effectively for the maintenance and improvement of these facilities. The audit’s findings could lead to legislative recommendations that may reshape how boating services are managed in the state.

Summary

Senate Resolution 162, introduced during the Thirty-second Legislature of Hawaii in 2023, calls for a comprehensive management audit of the Division of Boating and Ocean Recreation under the Department of Land and Natural Resources. This resolution underscores the importance of the Division's mission to enhance the lives of residents and visitors through access to ocean-based activities and facilities. Despite its goals, the Division has faced criticism for the deteriorating condition of small boat harbors and facilities, with past audits revealing significant mismanagement issues that threaten public safety.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SR162 include the long-standing neglect identified in previous audits, which have been consistently reported since as early as 1993. Many facilities are in a state of disrepair, raising questions about how state resources are allocated and managed. Moreover, the resolution highlights the urgent need for better strategic planning and operational oversight. Stakeholders, including ocean recreation enthusiasts and community members, may have differing views on the appropriate level of state intervention and the best practices needed to enhance facility conditions and safety standards.