Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SR20

Caption

Amending The Rules Of The Senate To Establish That A Failure To Submit To A Breathalyzer Test, Blood Test, Or Field Sobriety Test During A Lawful Stop Shall Be Grounds For Expulsion.

Impact

If adopted, SR20 would formally lay out the consequences of refusal to comply with sobriety tests for legislators, specifically allowing for an expulsion process under Article III, Section 12 of the Hawaii State Constitution. This amendment would require legislators to lead by example, reinforcing the idea that those in power must act responsibly, particularly regarding public safety issues like drunk driving. Through this resolution, the legislature aims to foster a culture of accountability among its members, ensuring that they are subjected to the same principles governing the safety of the public they serve.

Summary

Senate Resolution 20 (SR20) proposes an amendment to the rules of the Hawaii State Senate, establishing that a failure by any member of the legislature to submit to a breathalyzer test, blood test, or field sobriety test during a lawful stop by a law enforcement officer will be considered an act of misconduct. This measure is grounded in the belief that legislators, as public figures, should adhere to higher standards of conduct, especially concerning public safety measures like intoxicated driving tests. The resolution emphasizes that safe roads are vital to everyday life and that intoxicated drivers pose significant risks to this safety.

Contention

Within the discussions surrounding SR20, notable points of contention may arise regarding the specific implications of holding legislators to higher standards. Critics might argue that imposing such measures could create an environment of fear or mistrust, where lawmakers might feel pressured to comply for fear of expulsion. Additionally, concerns may be voiced regarding the practicality and fairness of the enforcement of such rules, especially in assessing the circumstances of each case. Supporters, however, would likely counter that such measures are necessary for ensuring accountability among elected officials, which can strengthen public trust in government institutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB974

Vehicles: driving under the influence.

CA AB330

Highway safety.

MD HB946

Motor Vehicle Administration - Breathalyzer Technology - Uniform Standards

LA HB415

Provides relative to the administrative hearing applicable to the suspension of certain driving privileges

NJ S4001

Requires prosecutors and courts to consider additional aggravating factors and habitual offender status in certain serious motor vehicle offense cases.

NJ S3011

Concerns use of ignition interlock devices for drunk driving offenses.

NJ A4800

Concerns use of ignition interlock devices for drunk driving offenses.

NJ A1725

Increases prison time for certain persons convicted of a motor vehicle offense when license suspended for DUI.