Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1626 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 1626 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2024 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to a probation compliance credits program. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 1626
4	4	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2024
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8
9	9	H.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	1626
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2024
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	relating to a probation compliance credits program.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that a 2020 study by the Pew Research Center reported the average length of probation nationwide is just under two years, with Hawaii having the longest average length of fifty-nine months, or nearly five years. A growing list of high-quality studies have shown that long probation sentences are not associated with lower rates of recidivism and are more likely to lead to technical violations, such as noncompliance with one or more supervision rules, including missing appointments or testing positive for drug use. Recent research from the Council of State Governments Justice Center has found that technical violations contribute significantly to state incarceration rates and correctional costs with more than one in ten state prison admissions the result of technical violations of probation rather than convictions for a new crime. The legislature further finds that probation should only be long enough to meet its basic objectives of providing accountability proportional to the underlying criminal offense, connecting people to needed treatment and services, and enabling individuals to complete programs, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and counseling that have been shown to reduce the risk of reoffending. A 2014 study by the Council on State Governments Justice Center found that in Hawaii, ninety-five per cent of felony probationers receive supervision terms of five years or more. Out of the felony probationers receiving terms of more than three years, sixty per cent are identified as low risk of reoffending. One of the recommendations of the Justice Reinvestment in Hawaii study was to offer time credits as an incentive for successful probationers. Focusing resources during the initial period of supervision, when an individual is most likely to commit new crimes or violate their conditions of supervision, is an effective practice that maximizes the likelihood of recidivism reduction. Shortening the length of time spent actively supervising low- and medium-risk probationers and parolees who have complied with their conditions of supervision allows resources to be focused on individuals who are more likely to reoffend and therefore are in need of more intensive monitoring. Eleven states have implemented compliance credits to reduce terms of probation, with five states offering thirty days of credit for every month of compliance, and three states offering twenty days for every thirty days of compliance. Such programs recognize that although probation was originally conceived as an alternative to incarceration, there is increased acknowledgement that keeping people on probation longer than needed carries unnecessary and unproductive costs and wastes scarce resources, without increasing public safety. Accordingly, the legislature finds that there is a need for a program that provides a reduction in the length of probation, also known as "good time credits", for probationers who comply with the terms of their supervision or treatment. The purpose of this Act is to: (1) Require the judiciary to establish a pilot program that implements compliance credits to reduce terms of probation for probationers who meet their terms of supervision; and (2) Appropriate funds for the pilot program. SECTION 2. (a) The judiciary shall establish a four-year compliance credits pilot program that reduces the length of probation for probationers in compliance with conditions of supervision. (b) In developing the pilot program, the judiciary shall: (1) Examine other states that have implemented compliance credit programs to determine best practices for the appropriate amount of credits, terms of compliance, and mechanisms for implementing credit programs; and (2) Consult with the criminal justice community and consider whether certain offenders should be excluded from earning credits and how financial obligations should be addressed. (c) The judiciary shall design the pilot program to ensure that probation promotes public safety and effectively uses resources to supervise offenders most in need of services and programs. (d) The judiciary shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2029. SECTION 3. There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $ or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2024-2025 for the development and implementation of the compliance credits pilot program. The sum appropriated shall be expended by the judiciary for the purposes of this Act. SECTION 4. In accordance with section 9 of article VII of the Hawaii State Constitution and sections 37‑91 and 37‑93, Hawaii Revised Statutes, the legislature has determined that the appropriations contained in H.B. No. , will cause the state general fund expenditure ceiling for fiscal year 2024‑2025 to be exceeded by $ or per cent. In addition, the appropriation contained in this Act will cause the general fund expenditure ceiling for fiscal year 2024‑2025 to be further exceeded by $ or per cent. The combined total amount of general fund appropriations contained in only these two Acts will cause the state general fund expenditure ceiling for fiscal year 2024‑2025 to be exceeded by $ or per cent. The reasons for exceeding the general fund expenditure ceiling are that: (1) The appropriation made in this Act is necessary to serve the public interest; and (2) The appropriation made in this Act meets the needs addressed by this Act. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2024. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that a 2020 study by the Pew Research Center reported the average length of probation nationwide is just under two years, with Hawaii having the longest average length of fifty-nine months, or nearly five years. A growing list of high-quality studies have shown that long probation sentences are not associated with lower rates of recidivism and are more likely to lead to technical violations, such as noncompliance with one or more supervision rules, including missing appointments or testing positive for drug use. Recent research from the Council of State Governments Justice Center has found that technical violations contribute significantly to state incarceration rates and correctional costs with more than one in ten state prison admissions the result of technical violations of probation rather than convictions for a new crime.
50	50
51	51	The legislature further finds that probation should only be long enough to meet its basic objectives of providing accountability proportional to the underlying criminal offense, connecting people to needed treatment and services, and enabling individuals to complete programs, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and counseling that have been shown to reduce the risk of reoffending. A 2014 study by the Council on State Governments Justice Center found that in Hawaii, ninety-five per cent of felony probationers receive supervision terms of five years or more. Out of the felony probationers receiving terms of more than three years, sixty per cent are identified as low risk of reoffending. One of the recommendations of the Justice Reinvestment in Hawaii study was to offer time credits as an incentive for successful probationers. Focusing resources during the initial period of supervision, when an individual is most likely to commit new crimes or violate their conditions of supervision, is an effective practice that maximizes the likelihood of recidivism reduction. Shortening the length of time spent actively supervising low- and medium-risk probationers and parolees who have complied with their conditions of supervision allows resources to be focused on individuals who are more likely to reoffend and therefore are in need of more intensive monitoring. Eleven states have implemented compliance credits to reduce terms of probation, with five states offering thirty days of credit for every month of compliance, and three states offering twenty days for every thirty days of compliance. Such programs recognize that although probation was originally conceived as an alternative to incarceration, there is increased acknowledgement that keeping people on probation longer than needed carries unnecessary and unproductive costs and wastes scarce resources, without increasing public safety.
52	52
53	53	Accordingly, the legislature finds that there is a need for a program that provides a reduction in the length of probation, also known as "good time credits", for probationers who comply with the terms of their supervision or treatment.
54	54
55	55	The purpose of this Act is to:
56	56
57	57	(1) Require the judiciary to establish a pilot program that implements compliance credits to reduce terms of probation for probationers who meet their terms of supervision; and
58	58
59	59	(2) Appropriate funds for the pilot program.
60	60
61	61	SECTION 2. (a) The judiciary shall establish a four-year compliance credits pilot program that reduces the length of probation for probationers in compliance with conditions of supervision.
62	62
63	63	(b) In developing the pilot program, the judiciary shall:
64	64
65	65	(1) Examine other states that have implemented compliance credit programs to determine best practices for the appropriate amount of credits, terms of compliance, and mechanisms for implementing credit programs; and
66	66
67	67	(2) Consult with the criminal justice community and consider whether certain offenders should be excluded from earning credits and how financial obligations should be addressed.
68	68
69	69	(c) The judiciary shall design the pilot program to ensure that probation promotes public safety and effectively uses resources to supervise offenders most in need of services and programs.
70	70
71	71	(d) The judiciary shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2029.
72	72
73	73	SECTION 3. There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $ or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2024-2025 for the development and implementation of the compliance credits pilot program.
74	74
75	75	The sum appropriated shall be expended by the judiciary for the purposes of this Act.
76	76
77	77	SECTION 4. In accordance with section 9 of article VII of the Hawaii State Constitution and sections 37‑91 and 37‑93, Hawaii Revised Statutes, the legislature has determined that the appropriations contained in H.B. No. , will cause the state general fund expenditure ceiling for fiscal year 2024‑2025 to be exceeded by $ or per cent. In addition, the appropriation contained in this Act will cause the general fund expenditure ceiling for fiscal year 2024‑2025 to be further exceeded by $ or per cent. The combined total amount of general fund appropriations contained in only these two Acts will cause the state general fund expenditure ceiling for fiscal year 2024‑2025 to be exceeded by $ or per cent. The reasons for exceeding the general fund expenditure ceiling are that:
78	78
79	79	(1) The appropriation made in this Act is necessary to serve the public interest; and
80	80
81	81	(2) The appropriation made in this Act meets the needs addressed by this Act.
82	82
83	83	SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2024.
84	84
85	85
86	86
87	87	INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
88	88
89	89	INTRODUCED BY:
90	90
91	91	_____________________________
92	92
93	93
94	94
95	95
96	96
97	97	Report Title: Judiciary; Probation Pilot Program; Appropriation; Expenditure Ceiling Description: Requires the Judiciary to establish a compliance credits pilot program for probationers that comply with their conditions of supervision. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
98	98
99	99
100	100
101	101
102	102
103	103	Report Title:
104	104
105	105	Judiciary; Probation Pilot Program; Appropriation; Expenditure Ceiling
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109	Description:
110	110
111	111	Requires the Judiciary to establish a compliance credits pilot program for probationers that comply with their conditions of supervision.
112	112
113	113
114	114
115	115
116	116
117	117
118	118
119	119	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.