The implications of HB1970 on state laws are significant, as the bill amends existing provisions in Chapter 196 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to enforce these readiness requirements on new builds. This is expected to facilitate faster and more cost-effective adoption of solar and electric vehicle technology, thus aligning with Hawaii's goal of achieving 100% renewable energy by 2045. The legislature finds that implementing such standards during the construction phase is more efficient and less costly compared to post-construction retrofitting, which can involve extensive modifications to existing structures.
House Bill 1970 aims to promote the transition to renewable energy in Hawaii by requiring new residential constructions to incorporate specific readiness for solar power and electric vehicle charging capabilities. The bill proposes that starting January 1, 2025, new homes offered for sale at fair market value must be equipped with solar conduit readiness, electrical panel readiness for photovoltaic systems, and dedicated receptacles for electric vehicle charging when applicable. This requirement is designed to streamline the process of integrating renewable energy infrastructure into homes during the initial construction phase rather than retrofitting existing homes later.
The general sentiment around HB1970 appears to be supportive among proponents of renewable energy who view it as a critical step toward achieving Hawaii's sustainability goals. The cost estimates provided suggest that making homes 'solar-ready' and 'EV-ready' is economically feasible, emphasizing the long-term savings on energy costs. However, there may also be concerns from some builders and developers regarding the potential impact of these mandates on construction practices and costs.
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may revolve around the enforceability of the new standards and potential pushback from stakeholders involved in the construction industry. There may be concerns regarding the additional initial costs associated with compliance and the impact on the housing market. Moreover, debates may arise over the efficacy of mandating such infrastructure for homes that may already face economic pressures, highlighting the balance between environmental progress and economic feasibility.