Hawaii House Bill HB2380

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/26/24
• Report Pass: 2/14/24
• Report Pass: 3/1/24
• Refer: 2/14/24
• Engrossed: 3/5/24
• Refer: 3/7/24
• Report Pass: 3/22/24
• Refer: 3/22/24
• Report Pass: 4/5/24
• Report Pass: 4/26/24
• Enrolled: 5/1/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24
• Passed: 5/13/24

Caption

Making An Emergency Appropriation To The Department Of Budget And Finance.

Impact

The passage of HB 2380 will directly affect the state laws governing fiscal appropriations, particularly regarding the management and funding of the mass transit special fund. It intends to authorize the release of $179 million to ensure the disbursement of allocated funds is not hindered. This timely funding is crucial to maintaining operational stability within the state's mass transit systems. By addressing the funding shortfall proactively, the bill seeks to ensure that transit services continue to operate effectively without interruption.

Summary

House Bill 2380 is aimed at making an emergency appropriation to the Department of Budget and Finance in Hawaii. The necessity for this bill arises from a projected shortfall in the mass transit special fund for the fiscal year 2023-2024. The current financial situation, as outlined in the bill, indicates that the mass transit special fund received over $405 million in revenues for the previous fiscal year, exceeding the budget ceiling. Additionally, a substantial carryover from prior years necessitates immediate financial action to avoid disbursement delays impacting transit operations.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding HB 2380 appears to be supportive, particularly among lawmakers who recognize the importance of continuous operation within the state's mass transit system. The recognition of an urgent funding need reflects a collaborative effort to prioritize public transportation infrastructure amidst fiscal challenges. However, as with any budget-related bill, there may be underlying tensions regarding resource allocation and the prioritization of funding within the state's overall budget framework.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from debates surrounding budget allocations and the appropriateness of emergency funding measures. Critics may question the underlying causes of the mass transit funding shortfall, scrutinizing previous financial decisions and the effectiveness of budget management strategies. Discussions may highlight the need for more sustainable financial practices in handling public transit funds, as reliance on emergency appropriations could indicate deeper systemic issues within state budgeting processes.