Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB2395

Introduced
1/24/24  
Refer
1/26/24  
Introduced
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Refer
1/26/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/16/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Engrossed
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Report Pass
4/5/24  
Report Pass
4/5/24  
Enrolled
4/22/24  
Enrolled
4/22/24  
Chaptered
6/24/24  
Chaptered
6/24/24  

Caption

Relating To The Hawaii National Guard.

Impact

The implications of HB 2395 could significantly reshape the benefits and retirement planning for Hawaii National Guard members. By excluding periods of active duty service from mandatory enrollment in the employees' retirement system, the bill seeks to refine the eligibility criteria for benefits. This change may alleviate some administrative burdens while also potentially altering the financial security outlook for service members who are called to duty. The distinction made in the bill suggests a nuanced understanding of the nature of National Guard activation versus other forms of service.

Summary

House Bill 2395 proposes amendments to the Hawaii Revised Statutes regarding the membership status of Hawaii National Guard members when they are activated for state active duty. Specifically, the bill stipulates that these members shall not be eligible for enrollment in the Employees' Retirement System based solely on their service during state active duty. This modification addresses the treatment of National Guard service members who respond to state emergencies as ordered by the governor.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 2395 appears to be generally supportive, particularly from those who advocate for clarity and efficiency in the eligibility definitions for retirement benefits. However, it may also face scrutiny from members of the National Guard community and their supporters, who could view the bill as diminishing their benefits. This reflects a broader concern about how service members are supported during and after their active duty engagements.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the exclusion from mandatory enrollment based on active duty service. Critics might argue that this could lead to unequal treatment of National Guard members compared to other state employees, especially those who also contribute to the retirement system. The justification for the exclusion may need to be robust, as it touches on the larger conversations surrounding support for military personnel in state service.

Companion Bills

HI SB3084

Same As Relating To The Hawaii National Guard.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.