Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB352 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 352 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 H.D. 1 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.B. NO. 352
4	4	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 H.D. 1
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8
9	9	H.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	352
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
14	14
15	15	H.D. 1
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	RELATING TO TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that, since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been an increase in gender-based violence against women in Hawaii, particularly through intimate partner violence. Further, the Domestic Violence Action Center's Helpline reported a forty-six per cent increase in calls to report cases of domestic and intimate partner violence from late March to early October 2022. The legislature notes that, though temporary restraining order (TRO) petitions are initially acted upon by a family court judge without a court hearing, a mandatory hearing is held within fifteen days of a TRO being granted in order to determine whether the TRO should remain in effect. The legislature further finds that the adversarial nature of the legal system requires petitioners who have received TROs to face their alleged abusers in court during these hearings. The legislature also finds that, notwithstanding the safety protocols that the judiciary takes to protect parties during in‑person TRO hearings, the physical presence of the parties within the same room may allow for respondents to intimidate petitioners through words or body language. Further, a 2020 study by the University of Arizona found that eighty-one per cent of legal advocates indicated that many, most, or all of their clients identified the behaviors of the alleged abuser or abusers' associates in court as a source of re-traumatization. The legislature also notes that survivors of domestic and intimate partner violence often lack access to transportation, child care, and paid time off, which can make mandatory in‑person hearings especially burdensome for petitioners. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to: (1) Authorize the family courts to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely upon request; (2) Require the family courts to consider certain factors when approving a request for remote attendance; and (3) Require the family courts to allow petitioners who allege domestic abuse to attend TRO hearings remotely. SECTION 2. Section 586-5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) On the earliest date that the business of the court will permit, but no later than fifteen days from the date the temporary restraining order is granted, the court, after giving due notice to all parties, shall hold a hearing on the application requiring cause to be shown why the order should not continue. In the event that service has not been effected, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. All parties shall [be present at] attend the hearing and may be represented by counsel. The court may allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely upon request; provided that the court shall allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely if the petitioner's allegations include at least one allegation of domestic abuse as defined in section 586-1. The court shall consider factors such as the petitioner's lack of transportation, child care, and paid time off as well as the petitioner's fear of respondent's presence in determining whether to allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely. The protective order may include all orders stated in the temporary restraining order and may provide further relief, as the court deems necessary to prevent domestic abuse or a recurrence of abuse, including orders establishing temporary visitation with regard to minor children of the parties and orders to either or both parties to participate in domestic violence intervention." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on June 30, 3000.
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that, since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been an increase in gender-based violence against women in Hawaii, particularly through intimate partner violence. Further, the Domestic Violence Action Center's Helpline reported a forty-six per cent increase in calls to report cases of domestic and intimate partner violence from late March to early October 2022. The legislature notes that, though temporary restraining order (TRO) petitions are initially acted upon by a family court judge without a court hearing, a mandatory hearing is held within fifteen days of a TRO being granted in order to determine whether the TRO should remain in effect.
50	50
51	51	The legislature further finds that the adversarial nature of the legal system requires petitioners who have received TROs to face their alleged abusers in court during these hearings. The legislature also finds that, notwithstanding the safety protocols that the judiciary takes to protect parties during in‑person TRO hearings, the physical presence of the parties within the same room may allow for respondents to intimidate petitioners through words or body language. Further, a 2020 study by the University of Arizona found that eighty-one per cent of legal advocates indicated that many, most, or all of their clients identified the behaviors of the alleged abuser or abusers' associates in court as a source of re-traumatization. The legislature also notes that survivors of domestic and intimate partner violence often lack access to transportation, child care, and paid time off, which can make mandatory in‑person hearings especially burdensome for petitioners.
52	52
53	53	Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to:
54	54
55	55	(1) Authorize the family courts to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely upon request;
56	56
57	57	(2) Require the family courts to consider certain factors when approving a request for remote attendance; and
58	58
59	59	(3) Require the family courts to allow petitioners who allege domestic abuse to attend TRO hearings remotely.
60	60
61	61	SECTION 2. Section 586-5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
62	62
63	63	"(b) On the earliest date that the business of the court will permit, but no later than fifteen days from the date the temporary restraining order is granted, the court, after giving due notice to all parties, shall hold a hearing on the application requiring cause to be shown why the order should not continue. In the event that service has not been effected, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. All parties shall [be present at] attend the hearing and may be represented by counsel. The court may allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely upon request; provided that the court shall allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely if the petitioner's allegations include at least one allegation of domestic abuse as defined in section 586-1. The court shall consider factors such as the petitioner's lack of transportation, child care, and paid time off as well as the petitioner's fear of respondent's presence in determining whether to allow the petitioner to attend the hearing remotely.
64	64
65	65	The protective order may include all orders stated in the temporary restraining order and may provide further relief, as the court deems necessary to prevent domestic abuse or a recurrence of abuse, including orders establishing temporary visitation with regard to minor children of the parties and orders to either or both parties to participate in domestic violence intervention."
66	66
67	67	SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
68	68
69	69	SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on June 30, 3000.
70	70
71	71
72	72
73	73	Report Title: Temporary Restraining Orders; Remote Attendance; Domestic Abuse Description: Authorizes the family courts to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely upon request. Requires the courts to consider certain factors. Requires the courts to allow petitioners who allege domestic abuse to attend TRO hearings remotely. Effective 6/30/3000. (HD1) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
74	74
75	75
76	76
77	77
78	78
79	79	Report Title:
80	80
81	81	Temporary Restraining Orders; Remote Attendance; Domestic Abuse
82	82
83	83
84	84
85	85	Description:
86	86
87	87	Authorizes the family courts to allow petitioners to attend TRO hearings remotely upon request. Requires the courts to consider certain factors. Requires the courts to allow petitioners who allege domestic abuse to attend TRO hearings remotely. Effective 6/30/3000. (HD1)
88	88
89	89
90	90
91	91
92	92
93	93
94	94
95	95	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.