Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB1071 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 1071 THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE FAMILY COURT. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 1071
4	4	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	THE SENATE
8	8
9	9	S.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	1071
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2023
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	RELATING TO THE FAMILY COURT.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays in family court dispositions of appeals could arguably violate both the state and federal constitutions' due process clauses. These delays conflict with the family court's mission to provide a "fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children". The legislature further finds that in recent years, some cases remained unresolved for up to eight years. For example, delays between filing the family court order and the supreme court's decision on appeal have lasted as long as: (1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016); (2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and (3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468 (2016). Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities when the matter becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeal process. Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite dispositions of appeals from family court decisions by allowing cases within the jurisdiction of the intermediate appellate court that involve a family court judgment, order, or decree affecting the custody of a child or minor to be transferred to the supreme court. SECTION 2. Section 602-58, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) The supreme court, in a manner and within the time provided by the rules of court, may grant an application to transfer any case within the jurisdiction of the intermediate appellate court to the supreme court upon the grounds that the case involves: (1) A question of first impression or a novel legal question; [or] (2) Issues upon which there is an inconsistency in the decisions of the intermediate appellate court or of the supreme court[.]; or (3) A judgment, order, or decree of a family court that affects the custody of a child or minor, including involuntary termination of parental rights pursuant to section 571-61(b)." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2023. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that delays in family court dispositions of appeals could arguably violate both the state and federal constitutions' due process clauses. These delays conflict with the family court's mission to provide a "fair, speedy, economical, and accessible forum for the resolution of matters involving families and children".
50	50
51	51	The legislature further finds that in recent years, some cases remained unresolved for up to eight years. For example, delays between filing the family court order and the supreme court's decision on appeal have lasted as long as:
52	52
53	53	(1) Seven years and eight months in Cox v. Cox, 138 Hawaii 476 (2016);
54	54
55	55	(2) Four years and eleven months in Brutsch v. Brutsch, 139 Hawaii 373 (2017); and
56	56
57	57	(3) Two years and six months in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, 138 Hawaii 468 (2016).
58	58
59	59	Delays can result in unacceptable incongruities when the matter becomes moot while the appeal is pending, such as when a child reaches the age of majority before the final child custody order makes its way through the appeal process.
60	60
61	61	Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to expedite dispositions of appeals from family court decisions by allowing cases within the jurisdiction of the intermediate appellate court that involve a family court judgment, order, or decree affecting the custody of a child or minor to be transferred to the supreme court.
62	62
63	63	SECTION 2. Section 602-58, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
64	64
65	65	"(b) The supreme court, in a manner and within the time provided by the rules of court, may grant an application to transfer any case within the jurisdiction of the intermediate appellate court to the supreme court upon the grounds that the case involves:
66	66
67	67	(1) A question of first impression or a novel legal question; [or]
68	68
69	69	(2) Issues upon which there is an inconsistency in the decisions of the intermediate appellate court or of the supreme court[.]; or
70	70
71	71	(3) A judgment, order, or decree of a family court that affects the custody of a child or minor, including involuntary termination of parental rights pursuant to section 571-61(b)."
72	72
73	73	SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date.
74	74
75	75	SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
76	76
77	77	SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2023.
78	78
79	79
80	80
81	81	INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
82	82
83	83	INTRODUCED BY:
84	84
85	85	_____________________________
86	86
87	87
88	88
89	89
90	90
91	91
92	92
93	93
94	94
95	95
96	96
97	97
98	98
99	99
100	100
101	101
102	102
103	103
104	104
105	105
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109	Report Title: Family Court; Child Custody; Appeals; Transfers; Intermediate Court of Appeals; Supreme Court Description: Allows cases within the jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court of Appeals that involve a family court judgment, order, or decree affecting the custody of a child or minor to be transferred to the Supreme Court. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
110	110
111	111
112	112
113	113
114	114
115	115	Report Title:
116	116
117	117	Family Court; Child Custody; Appeals; Transfers; Intermediate Court of Appeals; Supreme Court
118	118
119	119
120	120
121	121	Description:
122	122
123	123	Allows cases within the jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court of Appeals that involve a family court judgment, order, or decree affecting the custody of a child or minor to be transferred to the Supreme Court.
124	124
125	125
126	126
127	127
128	128
129	129
130	130
131	131	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.