Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2129

Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/18/24  
Introduced
1/17/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Refer
1/18/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  

Caption

Relating To Historic Preservation.

Impact

If enacted, SB2129 would broaden the scope of properties that qualify for protections under the state's historic preservation laws. This could lead to an increase in the number of properties eligible for state recognition, thereby providing them with formal protections against alterations and demolitions. Additionally, sites significant to Native Hawaiians and other cultural groups would be afforded additional recognition, allowing for a greater emphasis on preserving Hawaii's diverse cultural heritage and historical sites.

Summary

Senate Bill 2129 seeks to amend the definition of 'historic property' within the context of Hawaii's Historic Preservation Program. The bill proposes significant changes by lowering the age threshold for properties to be considered historic, expanding eligibility to those at least fifty years old, as well as allowing properties of one hundred years or more to be included based on their cultural significance to Native Hawaiians or other ethnic groups. This change highlights an effort to recognize and protect a broader range of sites that hold cultural and historical importance in Hawaii.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment toward SB2129 appears to be positive, particularly from advocates of cultural preservation and Native Hawaiian groups, who view the bill as a necessary step towards recognizing and honoring Hawaii's rich historical tapestry. However, there may also be concerns from property owners regarding potential restrictions on property use or modifications due to the new categorizations, which could lead to a divided response depending on individual perspectives on property rights versus cultural preservation.

Contention

Despite its positive reception among cultural advocates, the bill may face opposition regarding the implications of expanded definitions of historic properties. Opponents may argue about the balance between preservation efforts and property owner rights, fearing that the increased restrictions could complicate renovations and developments. The debate centers around finding the right balance between preserving valuable cultural identities while allowing property owners the freedom to manage their properties without undue limitations.

Companion Bills

HI HB1901

Same As Relating To Historic Preservation.

Similar Bills

CA AB2013

Property taxation: new construction: damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB1500

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

DC B25-0486

Uniform Community Property Disposition at Death Act of 2023

CA SB964

Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.

CA SB603

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1091

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.