Hawaii Senate Bill SB2149

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/24
• Report Pass: 2/14/24
• Refer: 1/18/24
• Refer: 2/14/24

Caption

Relating To Permits.

Impact

The implications of SB 2149 are significant for both the aquaculture sector and the management of aquatic resources in Hawaii. By enforcing a timeline for permit approvals, the bill seeks to encourage growth in the aquaculture industry, which could lead to increased local food production and associated economic benefits. Furthermore, the bill establishes two full-time equivalent positions within the DLNR to help facilitate the review process. This could enhance the department's capacity to handle applications more efficiently, potentially leading to improved regulatory oversight.

Summary

Senate Bill 2149 aims to streamline the permit process for aquaculture activities in Hawaii. It specifically requires the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to either approve or deny applications related to aquaculture within a 90-day window from submission. This bill is a response to the current challenges faced by aquaculturists in obtaining necessary permits, which can delay operations and affect the development of aquaculture as a viable industry in Hawaii.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 2149 appears to be positive among stakeholders in the aquaculture community. Many proponents argue that the existing permit processes are overly cumbersome and hinder the industry’s potential. However, there are concerns regarding environmental management and resource sustainability among critics who fear that accelerating the permitting process may overlook necessary safeguards for delicate marine ecosystems.

Contention

Notably, SB 2149 has raised discussions regarding the balance between facilitating economic development in aquaculture and ensuring environmental protection. While proponents are enthusiastic about increasing aquaculture activities and providing local jobs, opponents caution against the risks of overexploitation of marine resources. This tension highlights the ongoing debate between economic interests and responsible resource management in state legislation.