Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2319

Introduced
1/19/24  
Introduced
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/2/24  
Refer
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/2/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/2/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Enrolled
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Enrolled
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  

Caption

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

Impact

If passed, the amendment would impact Article VI, Section 3 of the Hawaii State Constitution, which governs the mandatory retirement age of justices and judges. By raising the retirement age, the state might retain experienced judges for a longer period, potentially improving the quality of judicial decision-making. This amendment may also affect the judicial selection process and the overall dynamics within the courts as senior judges are allowed to serve longer.

Summary

SB2319 proposes a constitutional amendment to increase the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices in the state of Hawaii from seventy to seventy-five years. The primary objective of this amendment is to allow for a longer tenure for those in the judiciary, which supporters believe will enhance the experience and stability of the judicial system. This change aims to accommodate a demographic shift where many individuals remain active and capable in their professions beyond the current retirement age, reflecting a broader societal trend towards extended working life.

Contention

Discussions around SB2319 may highlight differing opinions on the implications of extending judges' tenure. Proponents argue that experienced judges contribute to a more effective justice system, whereas opponents could raise concerns about the need for judicial turnover to bring in new perspectives and voices. Additionally, the potential influence of this extended tenure on the diversity of the judiciary, with newer judges potentially facing more challenges in terms of appointments and promotions, might be a point of contention. The constitutional amendment requires a public ballot, ensuring that the decision ultimately rests with the citizens of Hawaii.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB526

Authorizes the La. Community and Technical Colleges System Board of Supervisors to increase tuition and mandatory fee amounts at institutions under its supervision and management and permits the uniform imposition of tuition and mandatory fee amounts on a per credit hour basis (RE +$5,300,000 SG RV See Note)

LA HB194

Provides relative to the authority of public postsecondary education management boards to increase tuition and mandatory fee amounts (EG INCREASE SG RV See Note)

HI SB992

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

HI SB992

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

CA AB703

Public postsecondary education: fee waivers for exonerated persons.

HI SB175

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

HI HB2509

Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3 Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.

LA HB1078

Provides relative to the authority of public postsecondary education management boards to increase tuition and mandatory fee amounts (OR +$257,600,000 SG RV See Note)