Hawaii Senate Bill SB2588

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/24
• Refer: 1/24/24
• Report Pass: 2/16/24
• Refer: 2/16/24

Caption

Relating To Historic Preservation.

Impact

The implementation of SB2588 is expected to significantly bolster the State's historic preservation efforts, especially concerning Native Hawaiian history and cultural practices. By creating specialized positions within the State Historic Preservation Division, the bill intends to reduce reliance on external contractors and enhance project management efficiency. This, in turn, will likely lead to better preservation outcomes and ensure that the historical narrative of Hawaii is comprehensively maintained and valued.

Summary

Senate Bill 2588 aims to enhance the state's capabilities in historic preservation, specifically by addressing the staffing needs of the State Historic Preservation Division. The bill proposes the allocation of funds to hire one historic preservation specialist and four archaeologists, which legislators believe will improve the evaluation and enforcement of state and federal historic preservation laws. By strengthening internal capabilities, the bill seeks to facilitate communication between various departments and expedite important preservation projects that reflect Hawaii's unique cultural heritage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2588 appears to be supportive among legislators, as the bill passed unanimously in committee votes. Stakeholders involved in cultural preservation advocate for increased investment in historic preservation, seeing it as essential to safeguarding Hawaii's cultural resources. However, there is an underlying concern about the funding implications as the bill will exceed the general fund expenditure ceiling, which requires careful consideration of fiscal responsibility alongside cultural preservation needs.

Contention

While SB2588 has garnered support, the main point of contention lies in the necessity and implications of exceeding the state’s general fund expenditure ceiling. Critics may question whether the appropriation meets the public interest effectively or if it places undue financial strain on the state's budget. The balance between investing in cultural preservation and maintaining fiscal discipline remains a significant discussion point among policymakers as the bill progresses.