Relating To Burial Sites.
The proposed legislation amends Chapter 508D of the Hawaii Revised Statutes and subsequently updates the Hawaii historic preservation special fund, which will now receive proceeds from the fines collected under this statute. This amendment is expected to bolster the state’s efforts in protecting significant archaeological and burial sites, ensuring that they are respected and preserved for future generations. The enforcement of this law may lead to increased awareness among private landowners about their responsibilities regarding site disclosures, ultimately contributing to the broader conservation of Hawaii's history and culture.
SB2591 aims to impose a penalty on private landowners in Hawaii who fail to disclose and record burial or archaeological sites located on their properties. Specifically, the bill establishes a fine of $1,000 for non-compliance when the landowner is aware or should reasonably be aware of such sites. The intention behind this legislation is to enhance the protection of cultural and historical artifacts by ensuring they are appropriately recorded and reported, thereby fostering better preservation practices within the state.
The sentiment surrounding SB2591 appears to be favorable, particularly among cultural and historical preservation advocates. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward safeguarding important archaeological sites and reiterates the importance of cultural heritage. However, there might be concerns from some private landowners regarding the implications of liability and the potential for financial penalties, leading to a mixed reception in discussions amongst property owners and industry stakeholders.
While supporters of SB2591 largely embrace the bill's focus on preservation, notable points of contention revolve around the specifics of implementation and potential issues of enforcement. Some critics may argue that imposing fines could unintentionally burden private landowners, particularly if adequate education on compliance is not provided. Others might raise concerns over the definition and scope of 'burial or archaeological sites', questioning how clear guidelines will be established to prevent misunderstandings and disputes in actual enforcement of the law.