Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2715

Introduced
1/19/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Introduced
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/13/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/13/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Enrolled
5/1/24  
Enrolled
5/1/24  
Chaptered
7/3/24  
Chaptered
7/3/24  

Caption

Relating To Unfair Labor Practices.

Impact

The implications of SB2715 on state laws include a shift towards enhanced protections for employees against employer intimidation in relation to their political expression and participation. By explicitly addressing how employers can engage with their employees regarding political topics, the bill aims to create a clearer boundary that defends the autonomy and free choice of employees in labor discussions. This change aligns with ongoing national conversations about the role of politics in the workplace and a desire to protect employees from undue pressure.

Summary

SB2715 proposes amendments to the Hawaii Revised Statutes relating to unfair labor practices. It makes specific provisions that prohibit employers from discharging, disciplining, or threatening employees who choose not to attend meetings aimed at communicating the employer's opinions on political matters. This significant alteration is intended to safeguard employees' rights, ensuring they cannot be coerced into participating in discussions about political influences related to their workplace. By defining both 'employee' and 'political matters', the bill aims to clarify the protections available to workers under these new stipulations, thereby reinforcing their rights in potentially contentious situations related to political discussions initiated by employers.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB2715 reflects a proactive legislative response to concerns about workplace rights and employee autonomy. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of protecting employees from coercive practices that may impact their political engagement. However, there may also be critiques from employers concerned about the limitations it places on their ability to communicate their views. This aspect signifies a nuanced debate between maintaining employee rights and ensuring employers can advocate for their perspectives without overreach.

Contention

Key points of contention in discussions about SB2715 focus on the balance between employee protections and employer rights. Critics may argue that the bill goes too far in limiting employer communications, potentially stifling open discussions within the workplace environment. Furthermore, there is the question of how this law will be enforced and what specific scenarios might lead to disputes about whether an employer has crossed the line into coercion. As such, the bill could become a focal point in ongoing conversations about labor relations and political engagement in the workplace.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

HI AB3092

Agricultural labor relations: unfair labor practices.

HI HB1029

Further providing for definitions; providing for notice and regulations; further providing for unfair labor practices and for representatives and elections; providing for initial collective bargaining agreement; further providing for prevention of unfair labor practices and for penalties; and imposing penalties.

HI AB3093

Agricultural labor relations: unfair labor practices.

HI HB861

Further providing for definitions; providing for notice and regulations; further providing for unfair labor practices and for representatives and elections; providing for initial collective bargaining agreement; and further providing for prevention of unfair labor practices and for penalties.

HI AB237

Public employment: unfair practices: health protection.

HI AB1340

Transportation network company drivers: labor relations.

HI S0124

Expands the definition of "employee," and clarifies that the board may defer a pending unfair labor practice charge to allow for the grievance and arbitration process to move forward pursuant to the charging parties collective bargaining agreement.

HI SB1523

Relating To Private Sector Collective Bargaining Rights.

HI HB2866

Relating to labor organization representation.

HI H5187

Expands the definition of "employee," and clarifies that the board may defer a pending unfair labor practice charge to allow for the grievance and arbitration process to move forward pursuant to the charging parties collective bargaining agreement.

Similar Bills

MI HB4236

Labor: collective bargaining; public employee's refusal to participate in certain meetings or communications sponsored by a public employer; prohibit the public employer from discriminating against the public employee based on. Amends sec. 10 of 1947 PA 336 (MCL 423.210).

MI HB4233

Labor: public service employment; labor organizations' assistance in collecting dues from public school employees; remove prohibition against. Amends sec. 10 of 1947 PA 336 (MCL 423.210).

MS HB605

PERS; contribution rates not increased unless authorized by Legislature, and make recommendation on changes to the plan.

MS HB1121

PERS; retired schoolteachers may be employed as teachers in public school districts and receive retirement allowance and salary.

MS SB2238

Retired teachers; allow to return to teaching for a maximum of five years while receiving retirement benefits.

MS HB1481

Retirement; county board attorneys and city attorneys shall be members of PERS regardless of hours/week worked.

MS HB1290

Retirement; county board attorneys and city attorneys shall be members of PERS regardless of hours/week worked.

MS HB385

Retirement; county board attorneys and city attorneys shall be members of PERS regardless of hours/week worked.