Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB3154

Introduced
1/24/24  
Refer
1/26/24  
Introduced
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Refer
1/26/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Enrolled
5/1/24  
Enrolled
5/1/24  
Chaptered
7/1/24  
Chaptered
7/1/24  

Caption

Relating To Regulation Of Archaeological Activities.

Impact

The amendments brought forth by SB 3154 strengthen protections for historically significant sites and human remains across both private and state-controlled lands. Violators of these provisions could face significant fines, potentially amounting to $20,000 per violation, along with additional penalties for damage caused to historic properties. The bill also establishes that individuals who knowingly violate these rules concerning burial sites may be barred from participating in state or county-funded projects for a decade.

Summary

Senate Bill 3154, concerning the regulation of archaeological activities in Hawaii, aims to clarify violations related to the handling of historic properties and burial sites. The bill amends Section 6E-11 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to outline specific civil and administrative violations that can occur if historic properties or burial sites are not handled according to established regulations. This includes provisions for taking, altering, or destroying such properties without appropriate permission, as well as the failure to comply with approved archaeological plans and mitigations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 3154 is generally supportive among lawmakers who prioritize the protection of Hawaii's cultural heritage. Proponents highlight the necessity of rigorous oversight to ensure that archaeological sites are treated with respect and care. However, there may be some concerns from developers and landowners about the implications of increased regulatory requirements, which could complicate land use and development practices.

Contention

A notable point of contention may arise over the administrative requirements imposed on developers, particularly those involving archaeological surveys and mitigation commitments. Stakeholders may debate the balance between protecting historic sites and enabling land development, voicing concerns that strict regulatory frameworks could impede economic activities while ensuring cultural preservation.

Companion Bills

HI HB2465

Same As Relating To Regulation Of Archaeological Activities.

Similar Bills

HI HB2465

Relating To Regulation Of Archaeological Activities.

HI HB320

Relating To Historic Preservation.

HI SB956

Relating To Historic Preservation.

HI SB2440

Relating To Burial Sites.

HI HB2607

Relating To Burial Sites.

HI SB2587

Relating To Burial Sites.

IL HB3413

DNR-REMAINS-NATIVE AMERICANS

DC PR25-0657

Historic Preservation Review Board Gabrielle Miller Confirmation Resolution of 2024