Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB393

Introduced
1/20/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Introduced
1/20/23  
Report Pass
2/17/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Refer
3/17/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Report Pass
4/6/23  
Refer
3/24/23  

Caption

Relating To The Landlord-tenant Code.

Impact

This bill is expected to have a significant impact on housing stability in Hawaii by incorporating effective provisions from a previous legislation (Act 57) that highlighted the success of mediation in resolving tenant-landlord disputes without needing to file eviction cases. The introduction of a dedicated pre-litigation mediation program could lead to a notable decrease in eviction proceedings, providing much-needed assistance to tenants struggling to meet their rental obligations. Additionally, the establishment of an emergency rent relief program aims to furnish financial support to tenants involved in this mediation, reinforcing housing security.

Summary

SB393 is a bill aimed at amending the landlord-tenant code in Hawaii to establish a pre-litigation mediation pilot program while providing emergency rent relief to tenants facing eviction. The legislation seeks to extend the notice period for lease termination from five business days to ten calendar days, thereby giving tenants more time to address rental issues. Moreover, it mandates landlords to participate in a mediation process before initiating any legal actions for summary possession due to unpaid rent, creating a structured pathway to conflict resolution between landlords and tenants.

Sentiment

The sentiments surrounding SB393 appear to be generally supportive among housing advocates and tenant rights groups who view it as a progressive step towards reducing eviction rates and fostering better communication between landlords and tenants. However, there may be some contention from landlords or property management associations concerned about the implications of extended notice periods and mandatory mediation, feeling it could result in drawn-out processes that impede their ability to manage properties effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance of rights between landlords and tenants. Critics argue that while the bill seeks to protect tenants from unlawful eviction, it may impose additional burdens on landlords due to the requirement for mediation participation and extended timelines for lease termination. The necessity for landlords to provide specific notices and engage with mediation centers may complicate their processes, potentially impacting their operational efficiency. Nevertheless, advocates call for such measures as essential rights to safeguard vulnerable tenants and promote equitable housing practices.

Companion Bills

HI SB393

Carry Over Relating To The Landlord-tenant Code.

Previously Filed As

HI SB822

Relating To The Landlord Tenant Code.

HI SB162

Relating To The Landlord-tenant Code.

HI SB2834

Relating To The Landlord-tenant Code.

HI HB1983

Relating To The Landlord-tenant Code.

HI SB3211

Relating To The Residential Landlord-tenant Code.

HI SB1293

Relating To The Residential Landlord-tenant Code.

HI HB2094

Relating To The Residential Landlord-tenant Code.

HI SB831

Relating To The Residential Landlord-tenant Code.

Similar Bills

HI SB825

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI HB1433

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI HB1439

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI SB3332

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI HB2642

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI SB1439

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI SB1439

Relating To Eviction Mediation.

HI HB1439

Relating To Eviction Mediation.