Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB745

Introduced
1/20/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Introduced
1/20/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Refer
3/17/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  

Caption

Relating To Agriculture.

Impact

The legislation establishes a mandatory fine of $10,000 for each violation of the false labeling law, which is now classified as a Class C felony. This enhanced penalty is expected to act as a deterrent to potential violators and ensure more stringent enforcement of coffee labeling laws. Additionally, the bill allocates funds for a full-time inspector position within the Department of Agriculture specifically dedicated to monitoring labeling and packaging enforcement. This step is seen as crucial in upholding the integrity of Hawaii’s agricultural products, which are known for their high quality.

Summary

Senate Bill 745 aims to address issues faced by Hawaii's coffee industry, which is vital for the state's economy, valued at approximately $98 million annually. The bill expands existing laws regarding the false labeling of Hawaii-grown coffee to include roasted coffee products, thereby increasing protections for local farmers against counterfeiting. The need for this legislation arises from the recognition that much of the coffee fraud occurs in roasted coffee, which has significant implications for market pricing and the overall reputation of Hawaii's coffee brand.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 745 is largely supportive, especially among local farmers and agricultural advocates who believe that stronger regulations will help protect Hawaii's coffee industry from fraud and maintain its esteemed reputation. While the opposition to this bill has not been extensively detailed in the available discussions, there may be concerns about the implementation of fines and the effectiveness of enforcement measures. However, the overall perception indicates a consensus on the necessity of safeguarding the coffee industry's interests.

Contention

One notable point of contention could relate to the implications of imposing strict regulations and fines on small-scale coffee producers. Critics may argue that mandatory fines could disproportionately affect smaller farmers who might struggle to comply with the rigorous enforcement measures. Furthermore, the bill's long-term effects on market dynamics and consumer behavior regarding Hawaii-grown coffee may warrant further debate. Nonetheless, proponents argue that without these measures, the continued threat of counterfeiting could jeopardize the livelihood of legitimate coffee producers in Hawaii.

Companion Bills

HI SB745

Carry Over Relating To Agriculture.

Similar Bills

HI SB2363

Relating To Agriculture.

HI HB1584

Relating To Agriculture.

HI HB776

Relating To Agricultural Support.

HI SB1184

Relating To Agricultural Support.

HI HB310

Relating To Agriculture Education.

HI HB310

Relating To Agriculture Education.

HI SB663

Relating To The University Of Hawaii.

HI SB663

Relating To The University Of Hawaii.