Hawaii Senate Bill SCR143

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/24
• Refer: 3/14/24
• Refer: 3/20/24
• Report Pass: 4/3/24
• Engrossed: 4/4/24
• Refer: 4/5/24
• Report Pass: 4/15/24
• Refer: 4/15/24
• Report Pass: 4/22/24
• Passed: 4/23/24

Caption

Requesting The University Of Hawaii To Develop A Comprehensive Plan To Address Student And Faculty Housing Facility Needs At The Manoa Campus.

Impact

The resolution particularly targets the redevelopment of the Hale Noelani facility, which has been in disrepair and out of service since 2018 due to extensive maintenance needs. The proposal to increase bed space to at least 1,500 aims to alleviate some of the housing pressure by providing more on-campus options for students. In addition, the University is encouraged to adopt a new business model that incorporates mixed-use strategies and public-private partnerships, enhancing its financial viability and operational effectiveness in meeting housing needs.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 143 requests the University of Hawaii to develop a comprehensive plan for addressing the housing needs of both students and faculty at its Manoa campus. This resolution arises from an ongoing shortage of affordable housing across the state, which has affected the availability of on-campus housing options for students. The resolution calls for significant investment in existing facilities and the development of new housing models that ensure long-term sustainability and affordability.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SCR143 appears to be largely positive, reflecting a recognition of the critical housing shortages faced by University students and faculty. Proponents of the resolution likely applaud these efforts as a necessary step towards innovating housing solutions and addressing long-standing infrastructure deficiencies. However, there remain concerns about how effectively the University can implement these plans, given its historical challenges relating to funding and maintenance of facility operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the methods of funding and the balance between affordability and the financial sustainability of housing projects. Critics may question the feasibility of establishing a self-sustaining funding model through mixed-use developments or partnerships, particularly in ensuring that housing does not become cost-prohibitive for in-state students. The requirement for the University to report its progress also implies a focus on accountability, which could foster discussions about transparency and long-term planning in educational infrastructure.