Hawaii House Bill HB1391

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 1/27/25
• Report Pass: 2/10/25
• Refer: 2/10/25
• Report Pass: 2/28/25
• Engrossed: 2/28/25
• Refer: 3/4/25
• Report Pass: 3/20/25
• Refer: 3/20/25
• Report Pass: 4/3/25
• Report Pass: 4/25/25

Caption

Relating To Trade.

Impact

The passage of HB 1391 would amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes by creating a dedicated framework for trade relations with Ireland. The commission would facilitate collaboration between the two regions through various initiatives, including business and academic exchanges and infrastructure investments. An appropriated budget of $75,000 for the fiscal year 2025-2026 further indicates a commitment to these out-of-state relations activities, potentially leading to increased economic activity in both Hawaii and Ireland.

Summary

House Bill 1391, known as the Hawaii-Ireland Trade Commission Act, seeks to establish a formal commission dedicated to enhancing trade relations and investment opportunities between Hawaii and Ireland. The bill outlines the formation of the Hawaii-Ireland Trade Commission, consisting of eleven appointed members, tasked with promoting bilateral trade, initiating joint policy actions, and encouraging mutual support. This initiative highlights the state’s intention to foster international economic ties and leverage opportunities for mutual benefit in trade and investment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1391 appears to be largely positive among proponents who believe that fostering international trade relations is crucial for economic growth. Supporters emphasize the opportunities for local businesses to expand their reach and the strategic benefits of strengthening ties with Ireland. However, the discussions around the bill may also encounter scrutiny regarding the effective use of the appropriated funds and the operational efficiency of the commission.

Contention

Although there is general support for the establishment of the commission, notable points of contention may arise regarding its governance structure and its actual effectiveness in achieving its stated goals. Critics may question whether the commission can deliver tangible results and if its formation is the best approach to facilitating trade agreements. Additionally, considerations about the accountability of the appointed members and the transparency of the commission's operations might spark debate as the bill progresses through the legislative process.