Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1494

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Report Pass
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/14/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  

Caption

Relating To Sports Facilities.

Impact

The bill aims to amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes to manage the appropriation and expenditure of public funds designated for stadium development. It creates a Stadium Development Special Fund where revenues from various activities related to the stadium will be deposited. This includes earnings from operations, rentals, and concessions, highlighting a multi-faceted approach to financing that leverages both public resources and private contributions. This legal framework is expected to streamline the funding process while safeguarding unspent funds that would revert to the general fund if the project does not move forward as planned.

Summary

House Bill 1494 pertains to the establishment and funding of the new Aloha Stadium Entertainment District in Hawaii. The bill emphasizes the importance of this project as a significant public-private partnership aimed at revamping the stadium and its surrounding area, with the goal of completing the first phase of development by the summer of 2028. The legislation outlines strict conditions for the usage of funds from the Stadium Development Special Fund, requiring that specific project readiness benchmarks be achieved before the disbursement of allocated funds, thus ensuring a degree of financial scrutiny and accountability.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 1494 remains cautious yet optimistic. Supporters of the bill view it as an essential step towards revitalizing Hawaii’s sports facilities and fostering community engagement through sports and entertainment. However, there are underlying concerns among some legislators regarding the effectiveness of public-private partnerships, with critics cautioning against potential mismanagement of public funds. The debate reflects a broader discussion on how best to balance public interests with private investment in major infrastructure projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the appropriations process and the conditions imposed on funds. Some lawmakers have expressed fears that stringent conditions could hinder timely access to necessary funds, potentially delaying the project further. There are also concerns regarding how effectively the stadium authority will manage these funds, particularly in light of historical issues related to similar public projects. Additionally, the requirement that later funding must come solely from private donations raises questions about the ability to secure adequate financial backing to see the project through to completion.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB386

School facilities: Efficiency and Sustainability Projects for Schools Pilot Program.

NJ A4488

Makes supplemental appropriation of $1 million from Property Tax Relief Fund to DOE to support Pantoliano-DePass school-based mentoring pilot program in certain Bergen County school districts.

NJ S3236

Makes supplemental appropriation of $1 million from Property Tax Relief Fund to DOE to support Pantoliano-DePass school based mentoring pilot program in certain Bergen County school districts.

CA SB725

Early childhood education: parent participation preschools: pilot program.

CA AB359

Pupil instruction: dual enrollment: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships.

MS HB1815

Appropriation; District attorneys and staff.

MS HB1760

Appropriation; District attorneys and staff.

MS HB34

Appropriation; District attorneys and staff.