Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB235

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/14/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
2/28/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Refer
3/21/25  
Report Pass
4/4/25  
Report Pass
4/25/25  
Report Pass
4/25/25  

Caption

Relating To Traffic Safety.

Impact

The bill's implementation focuses on improving safety outcomes in an area noted for its traffic hazards. It promotes collaboration among stakeholders, including the Safe Routes to School Advisory Committee, which is tasked with prioritizing infrastructure projects near schools. This initiative is particularly important for the protection of keiki (children) in the community, as it addresses the pressing concern of student safety in school-adjacent areas. It implicitly encourages local governments to adapt their infrastructure to meet the safety needs of the community.

Summary

House Bill 235 aims to enhance traffic safety along the North Shore of Oahu, specifically addressing the high-risk areas around Kamehameha Highway. The legislation mandates the Department of Transportation to extend the implementation of automated traffic enforcement systems, including photo red light imaging detector systems and automated speed enforcement systems, after public education efforts by the City and County of Honolulu. By broadening the use of these enforcement systems, the bill intends to reduce the occurrence of collisions involving pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists in this corridor.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around HB 235 appears to be positive, particularly among safety advocates and local officials who recognize the critical need for improved traffic management and pedestrian protection. Supporters argue that the use of automated enforcement will enhance compliance and deter dangerous driving behaviors. However, there may be contention regarding privacy concerns and the effectiveness of such enforcement measures, highlighting the dual nature of support and skepticism that characterizes discussions on automated traffic systems.

Contention

Despite its aims, HB 235 may face challenges such as resistance from individuals wary of increased surveillance through automated systems. Additionally, the necessity for public education before implementation could lead to delays and complications, as it relies on the readiness of the City and County of Honolulu to adjust its traffic systems. The bill's efficacy will largely depend on stakeholder engagement and the ongoing dialogue between community members and the Department of Transportation to ensure chosen locations for enforcement systems address the most pressing safety concerns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1250

Department of Transportation: low-carbon materials.

CA SB1376

Transportation network companies: accessibility for persons with disabilities.

CA AB1233

Transportation Inspector General.

CA SB1121

State and local transportation system: needs assessment.

CA AB1343

Local alternative transportation improvement program: Feather River crossing.

UT HB0006

Transportation and Infrastructure Base Budget

HI SB1092

Relating To Transportation Demand Management.

CA SB925

City and County of San Francisco: merchandising sales.