Hawaii House Bill HB392

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/25
• Refer: 1/21/25
• Report Pass: 2/27/25
• Engrossed: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 3/28/25
• Enrolled: 3/31/25
• Chaptered: 4/11/25
• Passed: 4/11/25

Caption

Relating To Firearms.

Impact

The proposed amendments to Hawaii Revised Statutes under HB 392 include the establishment of mandatory minimum sentences for individuals convicted of using ghost guns in the commission of various felonies. This includes significant prison time for serious crimes, such as murder or class A felonies, which proponents claim will act as a deterrent against the use of such firearms in illegal activities. The law would specifically earmark longer sentences for repeat offenders utilizing ghost guns, reflecting a tough stance on firearm-related crimes.

Summary

House Bill 392 addresses the issue of 'ghost guns'—firearms that lack serial numbers and are often untraceable. By defining ghost guns and prohibiting their possession, transfer, and sale, the bill seeks to tighten existing firearms laws in Hawaii. The legislation aims to enhance public safety by regulating firearms that can easily evade tracking, which supporters argue is critical in reducing gun violence and illegal firearm use in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 392 appears largely supportive from public safety advocates and law enforcement agencies, who emphasize the need for stricter gun control measures to combat rising crime rates involving firearms. Critics, however, might express concerns regarding the implications of mandatory minimum sentencing, arguing that it could lead to disproportionately harsh penalties for non-violent offenders. The debate touches upon broader discussions about gun rights and the effectiveness of legislative measures in the realm of public safety.

Contention

While the bill is designed to strengthen firearms regulations, notable contentions arise around the definitions and penalties stipulated. Opponents may argue that the term 'ghost gun' could encompass a broad range of firearms and lead to potential abuses of the law. Additionally, discussions may center on the effectiveness of mandatory minimum sentencing in addressing root causes of gun violence versus simply increasing incarceration rates. This pivotal point reflects ongoing national debates about balancing gun rights with public safety.