Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HCR61 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.C.R. NO. 61 THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 STATE OF HAWAII HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION requesting A study EXAMINING how certain other jurisdictions produce fiscal notes.
2	2
3	3	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.C.R. NO. 61
4	4	THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8
9	9	H.C.R. NO.
10	10
11	11	61
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29	HOUSE CONCURRENT
30	30
31	31	RESOLUTION
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	requesting A study EXAMINING how certain other jurisdictions produce fiscal notes.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43
44	44
45	45	WHEREAS, the Hawaii State Constitution assigns the authority to appropriate funds to the Hawaii State Legislature; and WHEREAS, during each Regular Session, the Legislature considers hundreds of spending- and tax-related bills that may have an impact on the State's budget; and WHEREAS, members of the Hawaii State Legislature would benefit from having accurate and useful information about the fiscal impacts of those bills; and WHEREAS, in many other states, legislators analyzing fiscal measures may refer to fiscal notes, which are written reports that project the budget impacts of some or all bills; and WHEREAS, among the states that use fiscal notes, the procedures used to produce the notes and the information contained within the reports differ dramatically from state to state; and WHEREAS, for example, in most states, fiscal notes are produced by a nonpartisan legislative fiscal office, while in other states, fiscal notes are produced by an executive branch agency that is involved in development of the executive budget, or in a few states, by a legislative committee; and WHEREAS, similarly, some states require fiscal notes to be produced for every bill that may have a significant financial impact, while other states produce fiscal notes only for select bills or upon the request of legislators; and WHEREAS, some states project the costs of legislation for a single fiscal year, while other states project the costs of legislation for multiple fiscal years; for example, projections in twelve states and the District of Columbia include four or more years; and WHEREAS, some states require fiscal notes to be updated each time a bill is amended during the legislative process, while other states do not require such revisions; and WHEREAS, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in its report entitled "Better Cost Estimates, Better Budgets," noted that Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Oregon, Texas, and the District of Columbia meet all of its best practices criteria in the production of fiscal notes, because those jurisdictions: (1) Prepare fiscal notes for all bills and revise the fiscal notes as the bills move through the legislative process; (2) Create fiscal notes in a manner that is free from partisan pressure; (3) Project the long-term fiscal impacts of proposed legislation; and (4) Make fiscal notes accessible to the public; and WHEREAS, presently, the Hawaii State Legislature's budget committees work with the executive branch to estimate the fiscal impacts of legislative proposals; however, there are no formal fiscal notes produced; and WHEREAS, although Act 127, Session Laws of Hawaii 1990, established an Office of the Legislative Analyst under chapter 21F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as a separate fiscal policy office in the legislative branch, it has never been funded; and WHEREAS, according to section 21F-7(a), Hawaii Revised Statutes, the purposes of the Office of the Legislative Analyst include: (1) Providing the Legislature with research and analysis of current and projected state revenues and expenditures; (2) Researching economic and fiscal policy; (3) Providing economic reports and studies on the state of Hawaii's economy; (4) Conducting budget and tax studies and providing general fiscal and budgetary information; (5) Reviewing the operation of state programs to appraise the implementation of state laws regarding the expenditure of funds and recommending means to improve efficiency; and (6) Recommending changes in the mix of revenue sources for programs, in the percentage of state expenditures devoted to major programs, and in the role of the Legislature in overseeing state government expenditures and revenue projections; and WHEREAS, section 21F-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, requires state agencies to comply with requests of the Office of the Legislative Analyst for information, data, estimates, and statistics, and requires the heads of certain agencies to provide the Office of the Legislative Analyst with full and free access to information, data, estimates, and statistics on the state budget, revenue, and expenditures; and WHEREAS, accordingly, it would be beneficial to study how other states generate fiscal notes to determine which state model, if any, would work best for Hawaii; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-third Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2025, the Senate concurring, that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to study how Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Oregon, Texas, and the District of Columbia produce fiscal notes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, for each jurisdiction examined, the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to analyze: (1) The statute, rule, or other authority governing the preparation of fiscal notes; (2) The types of bills for which fiscal notes are produced; (3) At what points during the legislative process fiscal notes are produced and revised; (4) The type of information included in the fiscal note; (5) The entity responsible for producing the fiscal note; (6) The time period for which the jurisdiction must project financial impacts; and (7) Any other matters that the Legislative Reference Bureau believes may be helpful or significant for the purposes of the study; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the Regular Session of 2026; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to the Director of the Legislative Reference Bureau. OFFERED BY: _____________________________
46	46
47	47	WHEREAS, the Hawaii State Constitution assigns the authority to appropriate funds to the Hawaii State Legislature; and
48	48
49	49
50	50
51	51	WHEREAS, during each Regular Session, the Legislature considers hundreds of spending- and tax-related bills that may have an impact on the State's budget; and
52	52
53	53
54	54
55	55	WHEREAS, members of the Hawaii State Legislature would benefit from having accurate and useful information about the fiscal impacts of those bills; and
56	56
57	57
58	58
59	59	WHEREAS, in many other states, legislators analyzing fiscal measures may refer to fiscal notes, which are written reports that project the budget impacts of some or all bills; and
60	60
61	61
62	62
63	63	WHEREAS, among the states that use fiscal notes, the procedures used to produce the notes and the information contained within the reports differ dramatically from state to state; and
64	64
65	65
66	66
67	67	WHEREAS, for example, in most states, fiscal notes are produced by a nonpartisan legislative fiscal office, while in other states, fiscal notes are produced by an executive branch agency that is involved in development of the executive budget, or in a few states, by a legislative committee; and
68	68
69	69
70	70
71	71	WHEREAS, similarly, some states require fiscal notes to be produced for every bill that may have a significant financial impact, while other states produce fiscal notes only for select bills or upon the request of legislators; and
72	72
73	73	WHEREAS, some states project the costs of legislation for a single fiscal year, while other states project the costs of legislation for multiple fiscal years; for example, projections in twelve states and the District of Columbia include four or more years; and
74	74
75	75
76	76
77	77	WHEREAS, some states require fiscal notes to be updated each time a bill is amended during the legislative process, while other states do not require such revisions; and
78	78
79	79
80	80
81	81	WHEREAS, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in its report entitled "Better Cost Estimates, Better Budgets," noted that Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Oregon, Texas, and the District of Columbia meet all of its best practices criteria in the production of fiscal notes, because those jurisdictions:
82	82
83	83
84	84
85	85	(1) Prepare fiscal notes for all bills and revise the fiscal notes as the bills move through the legislative process;
86	86
87	87
88	88
89	89	(2) Create fiscal notes in a manner that is free from partisan pressure;
90	90
91	91
92	92
93	93	(3) Project the long-term fiscal impacts of proposed legislation; and
94	94
95	95
96	96
97	97	(4) Make fiscal notes accessible to the public; and
98	98
99	99
100	100
101	101	WHEREAS, presently, the Hawaii State Legislature's budget committees work with the executive branch to estimate the fiscal impacts of legislative proposals; however, there are no formal fiscal notes produced; and
102	102
103	103
104	104
105	105	WHEREAS, although Act 127, Session Laws of Hawaii 1990, established an Office of the Legislative Analyst under chapter 21F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as a separate fiscal policy office in the legislative branch, it has never been funded; and
106	106
107	107
108	108
109	109	WHEREAS, according to section 21F-7(a), Hawaii Revised Statutes, the purposes of the Office of the Legislative Analyst include:
110	110
111	111	(1) Providing the Legislature with research and analysis of current and projected state revenues and expenditures;
112	112
113	113
114	114
115	115	(2) Researching economic and fiscal policy;
116	116
117	117
118	118
119	119	(3) Providing economic reports and studies on the state of Hawaii's economy;
120	120
121	121
122	122
123	123	(4) Conducting budget and tax studies and providing general fiscal and budgetary information;
124	124
125	125
126	126
127	127	(5) Reviewing the operation of state programs to appraise the implementation of state laws regarding the expenditure of funds and recommending means to improve efficiency; and
128	128
129	129
130	130
131	131	(6) Recommending changes in the mix of revenue sources for programs, in the percentage of state expenditures devoted to major programs, and in the role of the Legislature in overseeing state government expenditures and revenue projections; and
132	132
133	133
134	134
135	135	WHEREAS, section 21F-8, Hawaii Revised Statutes, requires state agencies to comply with requests of the Office of the Legislative Analyst for information, data, estimates, and statistics, and requires the heads of certain agencies to provide the Office of the Legislative Analyst with full and free access to information, data, estimates, and statistics on the state budget, revenue, and expenditures; and
136	136
137	137
138	138
139	139	WHEREAS, accordingly, it would be beneficial to study how other states generate fiscal notes to determine which state model, if any, would work best for Hawaii; now, therefore,
140	140
141	141
142	142
143	143	BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the Thirty-third Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2025, the Senate concurring, that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to study how Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Oregon, Texas, and the District of Columbia produce fiscal notes; and
144	144
145	145
146	146
147	147	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, for each jurisdiction examined, the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to analyze:
148	148
149	149
150	150
151	151	(1) The statute, rule, or other authority governing the preparation of fiscal notes;
152	152
153	153
154	154
155	155	(2) The types of bills for which fiscal notes are produced;
156	156
157	157
158	158
159	159	(3) At what points during the legislative process fiscal notes are produced and revised;
160	160
161	161
162	162
163	163	(4) The type of information included in the fiscal note;
164	164
165	165
166	166
167	167	(5) The entity responsible for producing the fiscal note;
168	168
169	169
170	170
171	171	(6) The time period for which the jurisdiction must project financial impacts; and
172	172
173	173
174	174
175	175	(7) Any other matters that the Legislative Reference Bureau believes may be helpful or significant for the purposes of the study; and
176	176
177	177
178	178
179	179	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislative Reference Bureau is requested to submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the Regular Session of 2026; and
180	180
181	181
182	182
183	183	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to the Director of the Legislative Reference Bureau.
184	184
185	185
186	186
187	187
188	188
189	189
190	190
191	191	OFFERED BY: _____________________________
192	192
193	193
194	194
195	195	OFFERED BY:
196	196
197	197	_____________________________
198	198
199	199
200	200
201	201	Report Title: LRB; Fiscal Notes; Study; Other Jurisdictions
202	202
203	203	Report Title:
204	204
205	205	LRB; Fiscal Notes; Study; Other Jurisdictions